Skip to content
Allan Neustadt Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Allan Neustadt Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$122kRecreation & Sports$93kReligion$74kHuman Services$61kHealth$35kCrime & Legal$25kAnimals$21kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$317k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST LUKES MCCALL FD$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
RICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION$5,000
VALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS$5,000
JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUND$5,000
SNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$4,500
DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION$3,500
OUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION$3,000
PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB$2,500
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION$2,000
MCPAWS ANIMAL SHELTER$1,500
CHARLES B GODDARD CENTER$1,000
CENTRAL IDAHO MTN BIKE ASSN$1,000
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING PAWS: $500 → 11%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $4k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 9%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION: $2k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 14%ARDMORE DAY NURSERY: $500 → 16%ARDMORE DAY NURSERY: $500 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 14%ARDMORE DAY NURSERY: $500 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $500 → 14%ARDMORE DAY NURSERY: $500 → 16%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $500 → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS: $500 → 14%TOBY'S PLACE: $1k → 8%TOBY'S PLACE: $1k → 8%TOBY'S PLACE: $500 → 8%TOBY'S PLACE: $500 → 8%TOBY'S PLACE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 56 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
25

Total granted

$519k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+22%

Still filing today

46%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    National Council for Adoption
    8× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +81%
  • PL
    PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +149%
  • RS
    RICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEADOWS SKATE PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • CG
    CHARLES GODDARD CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AC
    ARDMORE CITY SCHOOL ENRICHMENT FD
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
4
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
5
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Snowdon Wildlife Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $57,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF DALLAS: $35,900 · OtherFIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF DALLASST LUKES MCCALL FD: $33,500 · OtherST LUKES MCCALL FDOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUND: $25,000 · OtherJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDOKLA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $24,450 · OtherOKLA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONOUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC: $20,000 · OtherOUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INCMERCERSBURG ACADEMY: $12,000 · Other+57 more: $116,095 · Other+57 moreNational Council for Adoption: $27,000 · Human ServicesNational Co…VOGEL ALCOVE: $13,500 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOV…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMI…TOBYS PLACE INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesTOBYS PLACE…DALLAS FURNITURE BANK: $2,550 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $2,300 · Human ServicesARDMORE DAY NURSERY INC: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesPAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB INC: $26,500 · Recreation & SportsJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsVALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS INC: $34,000 · Community ImprovementRICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $21,250 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $17,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · Education
Other$354,045Human Services$57,350Recreation & Sports$34,500Community Improvement$34,000Philanthropy$26,500Health$25,750Education$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS INC: $34,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetNational Council for Adoption: $27,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB INC: $26,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetRICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $21,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC: $20,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $8,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $5,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTOBYS PLACE INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS FURNITURE BANK: $2,550 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $2,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARDMORE DAY NURSERY INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSHINE INDUSTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON CENTER FOR AUTISM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwest Jewish Congress: $300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget15-10 FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VALLEY COUNTY PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds National Council for Adoption ↗
  • Who funds PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD SABALA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds OUTCAST UNDER TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SNOWDON WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds TOBYS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max & Victoria Dreyfu…Communities Foundatio…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation IncDC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allan Neustadt Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allan Neustadt Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • World Neighbors Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allan Neustadt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home