Skip to content
All Angels Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

All Angels Foundation

To support the mission and programs of St.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$846kEducation$309kHousing & Shelter$260kCommunity Improvement$139kFood & Nutrition$80kHuman Services$58kRecreation & Sports$54kArts & Culture$46kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
North Dallas Shared Ministries$58,000
Housing Forward$30,000
St Philip's School and Community Center$15,466
The Magdalen House$15,000
Unlocking Doors Inc$15,000
Dwell with Dignity Inc$10,000
Jubilee Park & Community Center$8,802
Cornerstone Crossroads Academy$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $13k → 14%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $12k → 14%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $9k → 14%Housing Forward: $40k → 14%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $8k → 14%Housing Forward: $30k → 14%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $8k → 14%Dwell with Dignity Inc: $10k → 14%North Dallas Shared Ministries: $58k → 14%Bachman Lake Together: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 7 repeat orgs$349k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+52%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +50%
  • HF
    HOUSING FORWARD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +59%
  • UT
    UNITED TO LEARN
    3× · 2020–2023 · $58k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • GB
    GRACE BASED FILMS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $105k · revenue +1% · 32% of their budget
  • AC
    Anglican Communion Compass Rose Society Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -44%
  • VM
    VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
3
Cornerstone Community Development Corporation Inc

To improve the quality of life for residents in the South Dallas / Fair Park community by providing programs and services that help people break out of the cycle of poverty and empower them to become contributing members of their…

Human Services
4
The Cambridge School of Dallas

The Cambridge School of Dallas was formed in 2001 and is a college preparatory, non-denominational christian school established for the purpose of providing academic excellence in a christ-centered environment.

Education
5
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
6
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
9
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
12
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Forward; the most unlike its peers is Anglican Communion Compass Rose Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH: $1,148,305 · OtherSAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCHST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $85,073 · OtherST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTERFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $80,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+2 more: $40,000 · OtherHOUSING FORWARD: $70,000 · Human ServicesHOUSING FORWAR…NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $58,000 · Human ServicesNORTH DALLAS S…JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $49,146 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK &…VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $27,500 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEADOW…BACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $20,000 · Human ServicesBACHMAN LAKE T…DWELL WITH DIGNITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGRACE BASED FILMS INC: $105,000 · ReligionAnglican Communion Compass Rose Society Inc: $40,000 · ReligionUNITED TO LEARN: $57,500 · EducationCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $8,000 · EducationELEVATE NORTH TEXAS: $55,000 · HealthVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUnlocking Doors Inc: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,353,378Human Services$234,646Religion$145,000Education$65,500Health$55,000Philanthropy$25,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE BASED FILMS INC: $105,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $85,073 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $58,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN: $57,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetELEVATE NORTH TEXAS: $55,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $49,146 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAnglican Communion Compass Rose Society Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER: $27,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBACHMAN LAKE TOGETHER: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUnlocking Doors Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDWELL WITH DIGNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…Texas Instruments Fou…Texas Women's Foundat…The Addy FoundationHirsch Family Foundat…Dallas Mavericks Foun…Katherine C Carmody C…Hoblitzelle FoundationRoy and Christine Stu…Hillcrest Foundation
The Dallas FoundationTX29× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Hirsch Family Foundation · Dallas Mavericks Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Hillcrest Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All Angels Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All Angels Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on All Angels’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home