Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice Suzanne Hamilton Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$118kHuman Services$116kFood & Nutrition$82kHousing & Shelter$31kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$6kYouth Development$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Elizabeths School$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Family Promise of Lawrence$5,000
Ballard Center$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SMUD Museum of Science$5,000
The Nature Conservancy$2,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$300
NPR$250
PBS$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family Promise of Lawrence: $8k → 15%Family Promise of Lawrence: $5k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $5k → 15%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Sacremento Childrens Home: $5k → 12%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Jewish Family Service: $5k → 12%Family Promise of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $3k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$331k · 16 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +60% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$331k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+60%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    ST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +87%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +23%
  • EB
    ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +235%

Funded once

  • SF
    SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +60%
  • SC
    SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +13%
  • FB
    Food Bank of Sacramento
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Lutheran Social Services of Colorado

Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity and social justice, lfsrm strenghtens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the rocky mountain region.

—
6
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
8
Nourish Colorado

Nourish colorado is a statewide nonprofit organization committed to strengthening connections between farms and communities so that all coloradans have equitable access to fresh, nutritious foods. we pursue systemic changes through state…

Health
9
Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano

The food bank of contra costa and solano (food bank) was incorporated on july 28, 1975. the food bank was established in order to efficiently gather, warehouse, and distribute food products to contra costa county charities meeting…

Food & Nutrition
10
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
11
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies; the most unlike its peers is St Elizabeth's School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $31,650 · OtherELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSalvation Army: $16,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyOrangevale Food Bank: $15,000 · OtherOrangevale Food BankJewish Family Services: $14,000 · OtherJewish Family ServicesSt Elizabeth's Episcopal School: $13,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth's Episcopal SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $52,188 · Other+17 moreST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL: $64,000 · EducationST ELIZABETH'S SCH…FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE …DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE M…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $9,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY S…SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO CHIL…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $45,463 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,000 · AnimalsRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$215,338Education$64,000Human Services$55,200Food & Nutrition$45,463Animals$6,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL: $64,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $45,463 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $31,650 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $9,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds METRO CARING ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice Suzanne Hamilton Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice Suzanne Hamilton Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice Suzanne Hamilton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph