Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alice Suzanne Hamilton Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$118kHuman Services$116kFood & Nutrition$82kHousing & Shelter$31kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$6kYouth Development$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Elizabeths School$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Family Promise of Lawrence$5,000
Ballard Center$5,000
SMUD Museum of Science$5,000
The Nature Conservancy$2,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$300
NPR$250
PBS$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family Promise of Lawrence: $8k → 15%Family Promise of Lawrence: $5k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $5k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Sacremento Childrens Home: $5k → 12%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Family Promise Of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Jewish Family Service: $5k → 12%Family Promise of Lawrence: $3k → 15%Jewish Family Service: $3k → 12%Denver Rescue Mission: $5k → 12%Jewish Family Service: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$331k · 16 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +60% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$331k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+60%

Still filing today

44%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    ST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +87%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +23%
  • EB
    ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +235%

Funded once

  • SF
    SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +60%
  • RC
    RIVER CITY FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • SC
    SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Lutheran Social Services of Colorado

Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity and social justice, lfsrm strenghtens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the rocky mountain region.

6
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
8
Nourish Colorado

Nourish colorado is a statewide nonprofit organization committed to strengthening connections between farms and communities so that all coloradans have equitable access to fresh, nutritious foods. we pursue systemic changes through state…

Health
9
Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano

The food bank of contra costa and solano (food bank) was incorporated on july 28, 1975. the food bank was established in order to efficiently gather, warehouse, and distribute food products to contra costa county charities meeting…

Food & Nutrition
10
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
11
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies and the most unlike its peers is St Elizabeth's School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $31,650 · OtherELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSalvation Army — $16,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyOrangevale Food Bank — $15,000 · OtherOrangevale Food BankJewish Family Services — $14,000 · OtherJewish Family ServicesSt Elizabeth's Episcopal School — $13,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth's Episcopal SchoolIndividual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+17 more — $52,188 · Other+17 moreST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL — $64,000 · EducationST ELIZABETH'S SCH…FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC — $31,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE …DENVER RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE M…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $9,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY S…SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME — $5,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO CHIL…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $45,463 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,000 · AnimalsRIVER CITY FOOD BANK — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$215,338Education$64,000Human Services$55,200Food & Nutrition$45,463Animals$6,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL — $64,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $45,463 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $31,650 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC — $31,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $9,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ELIZABETH'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
  • Who funds ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds RIVER CITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME
  • Who funds BISHOP SEABURY ACADEMY
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds METRO CARING

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alice Suzanne Hamilton Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph