Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alberskuhn Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$513kYouth Development$304kEnvironment$196kEducation$157kRecreation & Sports$88kArts & Culture$46kHousing & Shelter$44kEmployment$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $253k
$14,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$34,000
DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER$25,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$25,000
AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION$25,000
THE TALKING FARM$25,000
MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$23,750
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$21,000
MOSES (MARBLESEED)$20,000
FOOD FOR MORGAN COUNTY$17,000
MORGAN COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM$14,250
SHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY$13,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$9,500
GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION$9,500
THE MUNY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%LAKE OF THE OZARKS IDIOTS CLUB INC: $17k → 13%MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 19%MOSES (MARBLESEED): $23k → 9%CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN: $35k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%SHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $14k → 13%MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $24k → 19%MOSES (MARBLESEED): $20k → 9%CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN: $30k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%SHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $13k → 13%MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $24k → 19%MOSES (MARBLESEED): $17k → 9%CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN: $30k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%SHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $13k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $21k → 19%MOSES: $16k → 9%CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN: $30k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%FOOD FOR MORGAN COUNTY: $18k → 19%MOSES: $14k → 9%CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN: $25k → 14%DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $25k → 11%FOOD FOR MORGAN COUNTY: $17k → 19%THE TALKING FARM: $30k → 14%DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $20k → 11%FOOD FOR MORGAN COUNTY: $17k → 19%THE TALKING FARM: $25k → 14%DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $20k → 11%FOOD FOR MORGAN COUNTY: $16k → 19%CURT'S CAFE: $15k → 14%DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $18k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - MORGAN CITY EXT: $15k → 19%DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $16k → 11%MORGAN COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM: $14k → 19%MORGAN COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM: $14k → 19%MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $14k → 19%MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $14k → 19%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15k → 14%GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $35k → 21%GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $34k → 21%GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $22k → 21%GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSA: $18k → 21%GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSA: $18k → 21%ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSA: $14k → 21%ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSA: $14k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 26 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$21k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationScience & TechArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +27%
  • DD
    DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $99k · revenue +9%
  • TA
    The American Youth Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $97k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2024 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
2
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
5
Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden

Exploring, explaining and celebrating the world of plants.

Environment
6
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
7
Cleveland Botanical Garden

The cleveland botanical garden connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
8
Lincoln Park Conservancy

The mission of the lincoln park conservancy is to preserve and enhance the inspiring beauty of chicago's largest and most visited park for current and future generations. we believe that beauty matters. that it has the transformative power…

Recreation & Sports
9
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

—
10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
11
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
12
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Marbleseed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100,500 · OtherMORGAN COUNTY R-II SCHOOL DISTRICTGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $90,900 · OtherGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICASHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $60,300 · OtherSHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRYST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSA: $41,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL-BSABOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL: $36,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - MORGAN CITY EXT: $35,000 · OtherMOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC: $30,000 · OtherMORGAN COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM: $28,500 · OtherCITYARCHRIVER FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherLAMB HOUSE: $26,000 · OtherThe Tower Grove Park Foundation: $24,000 · OtherHERBERT HOOVER BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $23,000 · OtherMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $45,550 · OtherMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUISCURT'S CAFE: $41,000 · OtherCURT'S CAFELAKE OF THE OZARKS IDIOTS CLUB INC: $29,000 · Other+2 more: $38,750 · Other+2 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $149,500 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTU…MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $46,500 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL…Forest Park Forever Inc: $44,500 · EnvironmentForest Park Foreve…Food for Morgan County: $80,600 · Food & NutritionFood for M…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CH…THE TALKING FARM: $123,000 · EducationTHE TALKI…The American Youth Foundation: $97,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Ameri…GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Recreation & SportsGATEWAY A…DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $99,000 · Science & TechMARBLESEED INC: $59,500 · Health
Other$676,500Environment$240,500Food & Nutrition$130,600Education$123,000Recreation & Sports$116,000Science & Tech$99,000Health$59,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $149,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TALKING FARM: $123,000 over 5y, 64% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $99,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Youth Foundation: $97,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFood for Morgan County: $80,600 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMARBLESEED INC: $59,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $46,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $45,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $44,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $41,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL: $36,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC: $30,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetLAKE OF THE OZARKS IDIOTS CLUB INC: $29,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetThe Tower Grove Park Foundation: $24,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $17,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE TALKING FARM ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The American Youth Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Food for Morgan County ↗
  • Who funds MARBLESEED INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds CURT'S CAFE ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MOSES - WISDOM OF MADISON INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OF THE OZARKS IDIOTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds The Tower Grove Park Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The US Charitable Gift TrustMA11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alberskuhn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alberskuhn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alberskuhn Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alberskuhn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alberskuhn Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph