Skip to content
Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family at a glance

· Private foundation

Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$46kEducation$40kHealth$20kReligion$15kHuman Services$14kPhilanthropy$10kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$439k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IVY TECH FOUNDATION$25,000
CONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL$2,500
Habitat for Humanity of Evansville$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
Southern Poverty Law Center Inc$1,000
American Civil Liberties Union of Indian$1,000
Evansville Police Foundation$600
Immigrant Welcome and Resource Center In$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $250 → 15%Immigrant Welcome and Resource Center In: $250 → 15%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%AURORA INC: $1k → 15%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
MO
KY
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 16 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$141k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +73%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +75%
  • TF
    TRI-STATE FOOD BANK
    4× · 2018–2021 · $7k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • EF
    EVSC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +97%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • II
    International Institute of
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
Indiana Civil Liberties Union of Indiana Inc

To defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the constitution and laws of the united states guarantee everyone in this country.

—
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
7
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
10
Urban Land Conservancy

Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.

Community Improvement
11
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Indiana Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bennett Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $16,250 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCOVENANT PLACE: $8,250 · OtherCOVENANT PLACETEMPLE ADATH B'NAI ISRAEL: $8,195 · OtherTEMPLE ADATH B'NAI ISRAELTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $7,350 · OtherTRI-STATE FOOD BANKCONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL: $5,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAELAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,750 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC+15 more: $14,800 · Other+15 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $37,900 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVA…United Caring Shelters Inc: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterUnited Caring Shelters Inc+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION…BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBERRIEN COM…EVSC FOUNDATION INC: $8,750 · PhilanthropyEVSC FOUNDA…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $5,100 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 · Crime & LegalCOVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $5,300 · Human ServicesAURORA INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesMEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE CENTER: $250 · Human ServicesTHE INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$66,095Housing & Shelter$42,400Education$31,000Philanthropy$18,750Crime & Legal$7,100Human Services$7,050Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $37,900 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $8,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $7,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $5,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $5,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Caring Shelters Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Len…Community Foundation …Centerpoint Energy Fo…St Mary's Health IncGerling Family Founda…Deaconess Hospital IncEvansville Endowment …Koch Foundation IncSol & Arlene Bronstei…Edward Love FoundationThe Bower-Suhrheinric…Welborn Baptist Found…
Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · St Mary's Health Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Edward Love Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family?

    Find your warmest path to Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home