· Private foundation
Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IVY TECH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CONGREGATION TEMPLE ISRAEL | $2,500 |
| Southern Poverty Law Center Inc | $1,000 |
| American Civil Liberties Union of Indian | $1,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $1,000 |
| Habitat for Humanity of Evansville | $1,000 |
| Evansville Police Foundation | $600 |
| Immigrant Welcome and Resource Center In | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +73%
- ITIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +75%
- TFTRI-STATE FOOD BANK4× · 2018–2021 · $7k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- EFEVSC FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +97%
- ACAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +11%
- IIInternational Institute ofone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the constitution and laws of the united states guarantee everyone in this country.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…
The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
Urban land conservancy's mission is to acquire, develop, and/or preserve community assets in urban areas for a variety of community needs especially in high poverty, low-income, underserved, at-risk communities.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Indiana Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bennett Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVSC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MISSOURI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
- Who funds ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BENNETT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT WELCOME AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · St Mary's Health Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Sol & Arlene Bronstein Foundation 1 Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Edward Love Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family?
Find your warmest path to Alan H Newman and Sandra P Newman Family through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.