Skip to content

· Private foundation

Al Webster Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$137kPhilanthropy$82kYouth Development$82kHealth$68kHousing & Shelter$25kArts & Culture$12kReligion$12kCrime & Legal$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$751k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRIS HEALTHY AGING$8,000
THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY$8,000
HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY$7,500
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA$7,000
FAIR HOPE CHILDRENS MINISTRY$6,000
DANVILLE LIONS CLUB$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,485
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE$4,000
GEORGETOWN HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $8k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $5k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION CO: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 22 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$393k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CRIS Healthy Aging
    8× · 2018–2025 · $54k · revenue +56%
  • HM
    HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • DF
    DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -13%
  • TL
    TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
2
Vermilion Council On Aging Inc

To deliver services to the elderly of vermillion parish. we are the designated agency (in affiliation with regional & state agencies) for meal services,senior center, homemaker, transportation and similar services to the aging.

Human Services
3
Vermilion County Farm Bureau

Promote and preserve agriculture activities for members

—
4
Voluntary Action Center of Northern Illinois

Voluntary Action Center, which serves Bureau, Dekalb, Kendall, Lasalle and Putnam counties provides high quality services that address the basic transportation and nutrition needs of its communities.

Philanthropy
5
Vernon Community Action Council

To provide assistance to low income families through various state and federal grants.

Human Services
6
Danville Area Community Center

Dacc is a non-profit, community-owned facility. the center provides a wholesome, healthy environment and pledges that no person will be denied membership or access to programs. the dacc provides for members of all ages, a wide variety of…

Recreation & Sports
7
Vna Community Service

To provide information and services to maintain and improve the quality of life for senior citizens throughout Knox County, Illinois

—
8
Senior Citizens Services of Vermill

To enhance and promote a community gathering place for senior citizens to socialize and enjoy life with others in vermillion, sd.

Human Services
9
Vermilion County Museum Society

To Provide General Museum Services to the Public

Arts & Culture
10
Vermillion County Christian Food Center

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
11
Downtown Danville Inc

Promote the Downtown area of Danville IL

Community Improvement
12
Serve Together Vermillion County

Provide christmas gifts for the homeless, home repairs for needed individuals, and financial support for the needy.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Danville Area Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vermilion County Rape Crisis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRIS Healthy Aging: $53,735 · OtherCRIS Healthy AgingHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE: $50,347 · OtherHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE: $43,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLEUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE: $24,414 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DANVILLETHE SALVATION ARMY: $21,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYEAST CENTRAL IL COMMUNITY: $19,000 · OtherEAST CENTRAL IL COMMUNITYVERMILION COUNTY HANDICAPPED ASSOCIATION: $11,500 · Other+18 more: $73,859 · Other+18 moreUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC: $26,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $17,414 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUN…Vermilion County Handicap Assoc: $13,750 · PhilanthropyVermilion Coun…Fair Hope Ministry: $38,200 · Youth DevelopmentFair Hope…THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $21,740 · Human ServicesCROSSPOINT: $10,600 · HealthVERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $4,060 · HealthVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $11,381 · Arts & CultureDANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH: $6,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL: $3,000 · Religion
Other$297,355Philanthropy$57,664Youth Development$38,200Human Services$21,740Health$14,660Arts & Culture$11,381Community Improvement$6,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRIS Healthy Aging: $53,735 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE: $50,347 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE: $43,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetFair Hope Ministry: $38,200 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC: $26,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $21,740 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $17,414 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $11,381 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSPOINT: $10,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $6,702 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH: $6,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetVERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $4,060 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRIS Healthy Aging ↗
  • Who funds HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Fair Hope Ministry ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds Vermilion County Handicap Assoc ↗
  • Who funds VERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH ↗
  • Who funds VERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · John P Cadle Foundation · United Way of Champaign County · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Vermilion Healthcare Foundation · Julius W Hegeler II Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Al Webster Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Al Webster Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Al Webster Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Al Webster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Al Webster’s filings →

    More from the funding graph