· Public charity
Ahold Delhaize USA Family Foundation Inc
Building healthy communities by supporting family health and nutrition.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $137k
- $10k–50k72 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.5M
- $250k+12 grants · $7.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOHN HOPKINS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $2,685,378 |
| DANA - FARBER (JIMMY FUND) | $1,095,567 |
| CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION | $769,766 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN | $567,038 |
| CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK | $450,000 |
| MILLIONS OF MEALS-FEEDING AMERICA | $400,000 |
| CONNECTICUT FOOD BANK | $400,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $350,000 |
| MARYLAND FOOD BANK | $300,000 |
| BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER | $285,000 |
| DIMOCK CENTER | $250,000 |
| HUNGER TO HEALTH | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NJ | $225,000 |
| PHILABUNDANCE | $200,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 70 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +98%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY6× · 2018–2024 · $9.2M · revenue +51%
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER6× · 2018–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +70%
Funded once
- LGLANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue -49%
- LGLANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITALgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +58%
- PDPA DEPT OF AGRICULTUREone grant, 2023 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…
Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.
Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
The mission of Comfort Food Community is to fight rural hunger with innovative programming that expands access to healthy food and builds community partnerships for lasting change.
The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…
The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…
Our mission is to enable our neighbors westmoreland county residents who are hungry or at risk of hunger to have ready access to food.
To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.
The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…
To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fredericksburg Regional Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Nehemiah Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
163 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 163 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PAWTUCKET ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds SWIPE OUT HUNGER ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DIMOCK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Members 1st Charitable Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ahold Delhaize USA Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Marthas Vineyard Center for Living Inc — 40% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- South Shore Community Action Council Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford — 20% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Action for Boston Community Development Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Charity Guild Inc — 10% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Bread of Life Inc — 6% of income from government
- Arlington Eats Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- The University of Bridgeport Inc — 3% of income from government
- Franklin Food Pantry Inc — 3% of income from government
- Northampton Survival Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 2% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 2% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fall River Massachusetts Inc — 2% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester County Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Ccsu Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ahold Delhaize USA Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ahold Delhaize USA Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.