· Private foundation
Members 1st Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $166k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LHM HOSPICE & SOCIAL SERVICES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THRIVE MINISTRY INC | $10,000 |
| IM ABLE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERIVCES OF CUMBERLAND AND PERRY COUNTIES | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALLENTOWN | $5,000 |
| HALIFAX COMMUNITIES THAT CARE | $5,000 |
| NEURODIVERSE NETWORK INC | $5,000 |
| SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| 18 SOUTH YOUTH MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| NEW BETHANY INC | $5,000 |
| KAREEMS MISSION | $5,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY | $5,000 |
| CAITLIN'S SMILES | $5,000 |
| 18TH WONDER IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PWPEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +89%
- CSCAITLIN'S SMILES INC2× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +14%
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- LALANCASTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +45%
- MFMIDWEST FOOD BANK PENNSYLVANIAone grant, 2021 · $10k
- CHCLARE HOUSE INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…
To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.
To partner with women facing homelessness to secure housing, achieve long- term stability, and chart new paths for their futures.
Ucp of central pennsylvania empowers people of diverse abilities to live meaningful life through innovative support and services.
The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…
Human services center is a comprehensive community behavioral healthcare provider that provides mental health and development disability services to lawrence county residents.
Chartiers believes each individual, regardless of economic status, has a right to achieve his/her highest potential and become a self-sufficient and full participating member of the community.
Skills of central pennsylvania, inc., a private, non-profit organization, is committed to creating opportunities and providing support for people who need specialized services to enhance all aspects of their lives. the vision for skills of…
The youth service bureau ensures that children, youth, and families will have opportunities to realize and fulfill their potential for growth and development through their participation in a continuum of community-based, family-based, and…
Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
The purpose is to provide residential, social and vocational programs in southeastern pennsylvania for rehabilitation of adults with psychiatric and intellectual disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoffman Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whitehall Township Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds CLARE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LHM SOCIAL SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOM FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAITLIN'S SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds OLIVET BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF READING AND BERKS COUNTY PA ↗
- Who funds NEW BETHANY INC ↗
- Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EMPLOYMENT SKILLS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CARLISLE CARES ↗
- Who funds COMPEER OF LEBANON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MIDATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds SCHREIBER CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds SAFE BERKS ↗
- Who funds THE CARING CUPBOARD INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds CAMP HEBRON INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC OF ALLENTOWN PA ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BERKS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds WILDHEART ↗
- Who funds LYKENS VALLEY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Perry County Literacy Council ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Community Aid Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · Schwab-Silfen Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Members 1st Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Members 1st Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Members 1st Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.