Skip to content
Agadino Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Agadino Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$40kInternational$34kCivil Rights$20kFood & Nutrition$14kYouth Development$11kCommunity Improvement$8kEducation$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$549k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FFRP CO URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC$7,500
PLANTING JUSTICE$7,500
MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$7,500
PHYSICIANS FOR PALESTINE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 5 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$60k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $22k · revenue +20%
  • RI
    REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • CW
    CHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • MC
    Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +307%
  • SA
    SCHOLARS AT RISK UCSF
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • PH
    PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
4
Global Perinatal Services

To create culturally responsive pregnancy and parenting experiences for Blak, immigrant, and refugee families.

Human Services
5
Circle of Health International

COHIs mission is to work with women and their communities in times of crisis and disaster to ensure access to quality reproductive, maternal and newborn care. See Sch O for full mission.

—
6
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
7
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
8
Pangea Legal Services

Pangea's mission is to provide deportation defense services, advocate for policy change, and provide education and legal empowerment for our immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
10
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
11
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
12
Galatians Community Health

The mission of Galatians Community Health is to ensure all individuals, regardless of status or background, have access to compassionate quality healthcare. The Organization supports the well-being of marginalized communities through…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dream Youth Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Physicians for Palestine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Homeless Prenatal Program Inc: $22,056 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program IncCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE: $10,000 · HealthCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVEMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $10,000 · HealthMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INCPHYSICIANS FOR PALESTINE: $7,500 · HealthPHYSICIANS FOR PALESTINELA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $6,000 · HealthLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INCDream Youth Clinic: $5,000 · HealthDream Youth ClinicMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $12,000 · OtherMemphis Center For Reproductive He…SCHOLARS AT RISK UCSF: $8,000 · OtherSCHOLARS AT RISK UCSFFFRP CO URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $7,500 · OtherFFRP CO URBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORES…THE ALMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $6,000 · OtherTHE ALMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD B…Destiny Arts Center: $6,000 · OtherDestiny Arts CenterCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIABreaking Ground: $2,500 · OtherMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7,500 · InternationalMIDDLE EAS…UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $6,000 · InternationalUNRWA USA …REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 · Civil RightsThe East Oakland Collective: $8,000 · Community ImprovementPlanting Justice: $7,500 · EnvironmentPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA: $6,000 · Animals
Health$60,556Other$47,000International$13,500Civil Rights$10,000Community Improvement$8,000Environment$7,500Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $22,056 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPlanting Justice: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR PALESTINE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDestiny Arts Center: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreaking Ground: $2,500 over 1y, 37% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…American Online Givin…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agadino Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agadino Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Agadino Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Agadino Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agadino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home