· Private foundation
Adams Legacy Foundation a Delaware Nonprofit
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $326k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $618k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY FABRICK | $200,000 |
| RESOURCE LEGACY FUND | $150,000 |
| ELINGS PARK FDN | $112,500 |
| WILDERNESS YOUTH PROJECT | $105,000 |
| LAND TRUST FOR SANTA | $50,000 |
| TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $30,000 |
| SAGE TRIAL ALLIANCE | $30,000 |
| HEARTS FOR SIGHT FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEUR | $30,000 |
| OUTWARD BOUND CALIFORNIA | $25,000 |
| WILDWOODS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $25,000 |
| LOS ANGELES NEIGHBORHOOD LAND | $20,000 |
| HILLSIDE HOUSE | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WYWilderness Youth Project Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +86%
- SBSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +74%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS4× · 2020–2023 · $165k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- RPRM PYLES BOYS CAMPgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +51%
- OCOrange County Rescue Mission Incone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -1%
- GMGATEWAY MOUNTAIN CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To conserve natural resources, agricultural land and open spaces for present and future generations.
As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
The Wildlands Conservancy's dual mission is to preserve the beauty and biodiversity of the earth and to provide programs so that children may know the wonder and joy of nature.
We conserve and care for the diverse wildlands, farms, and ranches of the central coast. we connect people to the land and to each other.
Engage.Protect.Enhance.Weareonamissiontobringpeople,water,andnaturetogetherwhilepursuingasustainablerevitalization of the Los Angeles River corridor.
Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…
Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…
Gfa works in partnership with and on behalf of the greater farallones and cordell bank national marine sanctuaries to preserve, monitor, research, educate about and enhance these invaluable marine resources.
ReScape addresses climate change by providing a regenerative, nature-based whole systems foundation for landscaping education, workforce development and policy.Foundational to our work is a whole systems watershed framework that…
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
Laguna canyon foundation is dedicated to the conservation and ongoing protection of the south coast wilderness. we envision a thriving coastal ecosystem that serves as a source of inspiration, connection, and refuge for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Twig Bazaar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ELINGS PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY FABRICK ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds HEARTS FOR SIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RM PYLES BOYS CAMP ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds The Nature Corps ↗
- Who funds COASTAL WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds REINS OF HOPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY MOUNTAIN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OUTWARD BOUND CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds EAYIKES ↗
- Who funds THE LONG BEACH SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The San Diego River Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATURE FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds Little Schoolhouse in the Woods ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · California Community Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Walter J & Holly O Thomson Charitable · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adams Legacy Foundation a Delaware Nonprofit funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Our House Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Adams Legacy Foundation a Delaware Nonprofit?
Find your warmest path to Adams Legacy Foundation a Delaware Nonprofit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.