Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abrams Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$278kEducation$139kReligion$19kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$8kHealth$4kEnvironment$3kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$40,750
Mr Holland's Opus Foundation$5,000
Hillel at UCLA$1,000
Jewish Public Affairs Committee$554
Santa Barbara Hillel$521
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$420
CEDARS SINAI GIFT ADMINISTRATION$360
LEADERS IN TRAINING$265
Ronald McDonald House Charities of$263
The UCLA Foundation$250
UCSB$250
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE LOS ANGELES$189
National History Museum$186
THE JEWISH FEDERATION$185
Friendship Circle MA$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Karsh Center: $191 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CA: $133 → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $1k → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $390 → 14%JEWISH CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $104 → 14%Southern California Counseling Cent: $103 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 21 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
29

Total granted

$483k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +4%
  • TM
    THE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • JC
    Jewish Center for Justice
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • GT
    GOOGLEYOU TUBE PLAY FOR CHARITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
4
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
5
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
6
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
7
Los Angeles Police Foundation

The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)

Human Services
8
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
11
Ucla Alumni Association

The mission of the ucla alumni association is to enrich the lives of alumni and involve them in the future of ucla.

Education
12
Economic Development Corporation of Los Angeles County

The function of the corporation shall be to ease the burdens of government by assisting, implementing, supporting and/or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of a public nature. which are directed toward…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Neptune Swimming Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $277,699 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $27,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $15,996 · Other+37 more: $33,679 · Other+37 moreMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $138,056 · EducationMARLBOROUGH SCHOOLTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION+4 more: $1,759 · EducationJewish Center for Justice: $1,573 · Human ServicesKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $191 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $133 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $103 · Human ServicesSanta Barbara Hillel: $1,021 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColorado: $513 · PhilanthropyMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $1,022 · Food & NutritionBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $260 · HealthMammoth Hospital Foundation: $206 · HealthUTAH HEALTH & HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $150 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · HealthNEPTUNE SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $368 · Recreation & SportsELDERHOSTEL INC: $157 · Recreation & Sports
Other$354,574Education$149,815Human Services$2,000Philanthropy$1,534Food & Nutrition$1,022Health$816Recreation & Sports$525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $138,056 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Center for Justice: $1,573 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERS IN TRAINING: $1,055 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $1,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $1,021 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF CALIFORNIA: $1,002 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION INC: $371 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEPTUNE SWIMMING FOUNDATION: $368 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMammoth Hospital Foundation: $206 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORONADO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $202 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $191 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $159 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELDERHOSTEL INC: $157 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH HEALTH & HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $133 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATE NOW INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE RESERVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Center for Justice ↗
  • Who funds LEADERS IN TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Hillel ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEPTUNE SWIMMING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Mammoth Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CORONADO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abrams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph