Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Abbaszadeh Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$546k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
13
Organizations funded FY2022
46%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of Abbaszadeh Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Abbaszadeh Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $546k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
8
’20
9
’21
11
’22
9
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 13
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
7
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 46% of the organizations Abbaszadeh Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 30% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202213$546k46%
FY202112$723k50%
FY202010$834k70%
FY20196$192kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.3MArts & Culture$905kEducation$479kHuman Services$420kFood & Nutrition$326kHealth$184kPublic Safety & Disaster$151kInternational$100kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
NY
MA
IA
PA
RI
CA
CO
MD
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Inquiry Inc$901,24045%
The California Partners Project$400,000417%
The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute$325,00047%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$178,4003n/a
The Aspen Country Day School Inc$134,30021%
Start School Later Inc$117,200435%
Direct Relief$50,00010%
International Medical Corps$50,00010%
Mehr Organization Inc$20,000432%
Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc$10,00010%
Show all 21 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($374k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Abbaszadeh Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 18 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter for Inquiry Inc: $901,240 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetThe California Partners Project: $400,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $325,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetThe Aspen Country Day School Inc: $134,300 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetStart School Later Inc: $117,200 over 4y, 35% of budgetDirect Relief: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Medical Corps: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMehr Organization Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetEverytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKnow Your Lemons Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUniversity of Minnesota Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTheatre Aspen: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNutritionfactsorg Inc: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Public Media Inc: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Family Health Centers: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Youth Center: $207 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWikimedia Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Abbaszadeh Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Abbaszadeh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Abbaszadeh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Abbaszadeh Foundation

How much does Abbaszadeh Foundation give?
Abbaszadeh Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $546,330 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 13 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does Abbaszadeh Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (34%), Arts & Culture (23%), Education (12%).
Who are Abbaszadeh Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2023: Center for Inquiry Inc ($901k), The California Partners Project ($400k), The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute ($325k).
Does Abbaszadeh Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 46% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Abbaszadeh Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Abbaszadeh Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Abbaszadeh Foundation based?
Abbaszadeh Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abbaszadeh’s filings →

More from the funding graph