How much did 1988 IRREV COCHRANE MEMORIAL TR grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of 1988 IRREV COCHRANE MEMORIAL TR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

catholic

2019

catholic

2020

foodcatholic

2021

southeaststrengthening

2022

southeaststrengthening

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k8 grants · $265k
$50k–250k6 grants · $360k

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$60,000
SOME INC (SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT)$60,000
ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY$60,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY$60,000
AMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST$60,000
WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER$60,000
DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING$40,000
MAMATOTO VILLAGE$35,000
TRANSITIONAL HOUSING CORP$35,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$35,000
L'ARCHE$30,000
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILDRENS ADVOCACY$30,000
FOOD & FRIENDS$30,000
ACADEMY OF HOPE$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 29 repeat orgs$755k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$635k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%

+15%

Still filing today

45%

29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BF
BREAD FOR THE CITY
5× · 2020–2024 · $245k · revenue +11%
DA
DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING
8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +106%
WE
WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER
4× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +30%

Funded once

FS
FAR SOUTHEAST FAMILY STRENGTHENING COLLA
one grant, 2022 · $90k
AC
AMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND
one grant, 2017 · $60k
MC
MARY'S CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Washington Voa Living Center

Low-income housing.

—

Habitat for Humanity of Washington

To reduce poverty housing in the nation's capital and northern virginia by building decent, affordable, energy- and resource-efficient homes for people in need. the homes are sold below cost, thereby making them more affordable to those in…

—

Washington Area Community Investment

To increase equity and economic opportunity by investing knowledge, social, and financial capital in low- and moderate-income washington area entrepreneurs.

—

Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition

National Low Income Housing Coalition

Achieve racially & socially equitable housing policies for the lowest-income people.

Housing & Shelter

Arlington Food Assistance Center

To feed our neighbors in need by providing dignified access to nutritious supplemental groceries.

Food & Nutrition

Archway Communities Inc

To provide safe, habitable housing for families with low to moderate incomes, including homeless families, and to develop mixed income housing to help low income families in the transition to self-sufficiency while providing comprehensive…

Housing & Shelter

Capital Area Asset Building

Empower low to moderate-income individuals in the washington metro region to achieve prosperity.

Community Improvement

Pathways to Housing Dc

Human Services

Archway Housing & Services

Housing & Shelter

Washington Community Reinvestment

The creation and preservation of affordable housing in washington state.

Recreation & Sports

The Dc Central Kitchen Inc

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Greater Washington Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anacostia Watershed Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

13/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,970,000Environment$595,000Human Services$400,000Housing & Shelter$355,000Food & Nutrition$285,000Education$175,000Health$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · Dimick Foundation · World Bank Community Connections Fund · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation 1988 IRREV COCHRANE MEMORIAL TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GREATER WASHINGTON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 522108599 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GREATER WASHINGTON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to 1988 Irrev Cochrane Memorial Tr?

Find your warmest path to 1988 Irrev Cochrane Memorial Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

1988 IRREV COCHRANE MEMORIAL TR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to 1988 Irrev Cochrane Memorial Tr?

More from the funding graph

1988 IRREV COCHRANE MEMORIAL TR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to 1988 Irrev Cochrane Memorial Tr?

More from the funding graph