Skip to content

North Carolina · Nonprofit

THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY

THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY (North Carolina) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $920,730 to it, the largest being THE LASTINGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($300,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.2M
Funders on record
28
Grants received
$921k
Net assets
$991k
16/28 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%
01What it does

What The Pisgah Conservancy does

Mission

The Pisgah Conservancy works in partnership with the u.s. Forest service to provide key resources for the benefit of pisgah and its visitors for generations to come.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Supporting recreation - maintenance and construction - a primary goal of tpc will be to enhance the recreational experience of visitors to the pisgah while protecting the rich natural resources that attract them in the first place. Construction and maintenance of infrastructure, including trails, trailheads, buildings, monuments, parking lots, and other facilities will play a central role in accomplishing that goal. We work to maintain trail stability, reduce erosion and flow of sediments to waterways, prevent unacceptable trail impacts on wildlife and cultural resources, ensure that trails and trail shelters are not in disrepair and are supported by user groups and volunteers, make sure that they serve a meaningful purpose within a trail complex (or, if not, support their decommissioning), promote user safety (including through improved signage), help open and maintain approved scenic vistas, and contribute sustainable funding for the trails. We also seek to make improvements to trails and trailheads that are aesthetically pleasing. To the extent reasonably possible they should blend with the landscape and augment the natural beauty of the pisgah. Watershed improvement - through…

    $669,061 spent$476,264 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $669,061.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($133k) Expenses 100 ($117k) Net assets 100 ($29k)2018 Revenue 342 ($453k) Expenses 142 ($165k) Net assets 1082 ($317k)2019 Revenue 281 ($373k) Expenses 394 ($459k) Net assets 786 ($230k)2020 Revenue 254 ($336k) Expenses 261 ($305k) Net assets 894 ($262k)2021 Revenue 564 ($749k) Expenses 387 ($451k) Net assets 1908 ($559k)2022 Revenue 457 ($606k) Expenses 416 ($485k) Net assets 2319 ($680k)2023 Revenue 603 ($799k) Expenses 577 ($674k) Net assets 2787 ($817k)2024 Revenue 883 ($1.2M) Expenses 863 ($1.0M) Net assets 3381 ($991k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (883)Expenses (863)Net assets (3381)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $290k to $627k (+116%).

$32k
$322k
$236k
$290k
$627k
$692k
$861k
$1.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 18% · 2021 5% · 2022 11% · 2023 2% · 2024 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

53% of THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
’17
$288k
’18
−$87k
’19
$31k
’20
$297k
’21
$121k
’22
$126k
’23
$164k
’24
5.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed89913111210
Joined·+1+1+5+1+1+0
No longer listed·011302
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $17k → $91k.

9 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 33% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

49% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY.

33%
largest funder
53%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 91% · 2018 83% · 2019 77% · 2020 79% · 2021 80% · 2022 25% · 2023 25% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY draws 77% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 10 states in all.

WA
MT
CO
DE
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
North Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $350k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,186 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin14% · above the median
Months of reserve5.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)36% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.8M on record.

Federal$1.8M
grants $1.8Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$1.8M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 18%Fundraising 16%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

NC
SC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY?
THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY (North Carolina) receives grants from 28 organizations whose IRS filings report $920,730 to it, the largest being THE LASTINGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($300,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 28 organizations giving $920,730 in grants to THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY?
THE LASTINGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE PISGAH CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pisgah Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 28 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing