Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Healthquest Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$43kHuman Services$17kEducation$4kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kScience & Tech$2kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE & HYGIENE$5,000
MYRIAD USA (LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROP MED)$1,500
HBS FOUNDATION INC$1,000
PASADENA VILLAGE$1,000
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL$600
PHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT$500
THE JESTER AND PHARLEY PHUND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE JESTER AND PHARLEY PHUND: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
CA
VA
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31k · 5 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$31k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+116%

Still filing today

60%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PASADENA VILLAGE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +330%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +37%
  • AF
    Amer Friends of London School of Hy
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k

Funded once

  • UR
    UC Regents
    one grant, 2019 · $23k
  • AS
    American Society of Tropical Medici
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Preventive Medicine Research Institute

Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…

Health
3
Palm Healthcare Foundation Inc

Palm Health Foundation invests in bold, community-led solutions that improve health and well-being in Palm Beach County. (Continued on Schedule O)Established in 2001 from the sale of Good Samaritan and St. Mary's hospitals, the Foundation…

Health
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
Foundation for Photobiomodulation Resear

To revolutionize local and global healthcare with Photobiomodulation PBM through education, research and innovation to improve health and the body's response to injury and disease. Experts present scientific evidence, viability, safety and…

Health
6
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

7
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
8
Pischel Hildegarde T Endowment Fund
Food & Nutrition
9
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
10
The Sir Philip Sidney Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Patient Safety Movement Foundation

Our mission is to disseminate actionable, evidence-based practices, advance their integration by healthcare organizations, and cultivate data transparency by 2030.

Education
12
Philanthropy International
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pasadena Village and the most unlike its peers is Stop Foodborne Illness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC Regents — $22,985 · OtherUC RegentsTHE PASADENA VILLAGE — $16,000 · OtherTHE PASADENA VILLAGEAmerican Society of Tropical Medici — $5,000 · OtherAmerican Society of Tropical MediciAmer Friends of London School of Hy — $3,000 · OtherAmer Friends of London School of Hy+8 more — $8,700 · Other+8 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE — $9,000 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIE…Pasadena Community Foundation — $2,000 · PhilanthropyHBS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationPHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT — $1,000 · InternationalSTOP FOODBORNE ILLNESS INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionCAMERATA PACIFICA — $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe Jester & Pharley Phund — $500 · Human Services
Other$55,685Health$9,000Philanthropy$3,000Education$1,000International$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PASADENA VILLAGE — $16,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTOP FOODBORNE ILLNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHBS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMERATA PACIFICA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Jester & Pharley Phund — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PASADENA VILLAGE
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT
  • Who funds STOP FOODBORNE ILLNESS INC
  • Who funds HBS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMERATA PACIFICA
  • Who funds The Jester & Pharley Phund

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Healthquest Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph