Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB (New York) is funded by 33 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,218,747 in grants to it, the largest being ELAINE GOLDKLANG FOUNDATION ($286,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,956 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,956 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2017
The base broadened — 1 funders to 8 as grant income moved $1k → $256k.
From the IRS filings of THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 33 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 60% · 2019 52% · 2020 58% · 2021 21% · 2022 42% · 2023 26% · 2024 31% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
18% of THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 33% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB is locally rooted: 53% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 33 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 33funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing