· Private foundation
William H Moffat Jr Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $560k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIV OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SKY TAVERN JUNIOR SKI PROGRAM | $75,000 |
| WHOLENESS THROUGH WELLNESS FDN | $50,000 |
| ARTFUEL | $49,000 |
| WILD WEST ACCESS FUND OF NEVADA | $40,000 |
| SACRED ROK | $40,000 |
| THINK KINDNESS (ONE MILLION AOK) | $40,000 |
| PIONEER CENTER YOUTH PROGRAMS | $35,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN NEVADA | $30,000 |
| NV YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT | $30,000 |
| CARSON CITY RURAL CHILD ADVOCACY CT | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST | $25,000 |
| THE HIPPODROME STOCKTON | $25,000 |
| HAVEN OF PEACE | $25,000 |
| SAFE TALK FOR TEENS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $328k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSky Tavern Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $405k · revenue +440%
- NNNortheastern Nevada SAFE5× · 2019–2023 · $301k · revenue +6% · 42% of their budget
- CRCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST7× · 2018–2024 · $297k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of the Pacificgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +37%
- TRTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +4%
- LPLINCOLN PTCone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF) is working towards a system of trails and bikeways in and around Truckee, California that will connect people and places, reduce our community's dependence on automobiles, and improve our physical,…
To protect and restore sierra lands, water, wildlife and rural communities. to engage and support efforts to adopt exemplary local sustainable community actions accross the sierra nevada that balance social, economic and environmental…
The Mission of the SNTR is to Operate a ranch for at risk kids.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
The tahoe nordic search and rescue team (tnsar) ... was conceived in 1976 as a response to the death of a boy lost off the back side of northstar-at-tahoe ski area during a blizzard. there was, at the time, no organized backcountry team to…
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
To advance the natural history, conservation and ecosystem knowledge of the Tahoe region through science, education and outreach.
The Sierra State Parks Foundation provides critically needed financial and professional support to the Lake Tahoe-Donner Sierra State Parks for Education, Restoration, and Cultural and Environmental Preservation in partnership with…
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Kids Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sky Tavern Inc ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Nevada SAFE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds ARTFUEL SKILLS FOR FUTURE ARTISTS ↗
- Who funds THE REAL LOVE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE TALK FOR TEENS ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF PEACE ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗
- Who funds Sacred Rok ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Rim Trail Association ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE TAHOE ↗
- Who funds THE HOLLAND PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds THE ENVIROLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds WILD WEST ACCESS FUND OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Awaken INC ↗
- Who funds Wholeness Through Wellness Foundation Corp ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds TYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST KIDS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RENO BIKE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ARTOWN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Renown Health · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · The Bretzlaff Foundation Inc · Robert S & Dorothy J Keyser Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William H Moffat Jr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.