Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Independent Venue Foundation

The mission of the NATIONAL INDEPENDENT VENUE FOUNDATION (nivf) is to preserve and nurture the ecosystem of independent live performance venues and promoters throughout the united states by supporting a transparent, competitive marketplace serving a diverse and inclusive community of artists, fans, and industry workers.

$242k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Public Safety & Disaster$2.3MArts & Culture$550kCommunity Improvement$43kHuman Services$43k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $161,788 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $241,821 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,033 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Independent Venue Association$42,788
Happy Dog$25,000
Clocktower Entertainment LLC$20,000
Lulu's Downstairs LLC$15,000
EWRB LLC dba No Class$15,000
The House of Songs$15,000
The Orange Peel Social Aid and Pleasure Club LLC$12,500
For The Funk Of It Productions$10,000
Montford Park Players Inc$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRANADA THEATER LLC: $24k → 11%CLUB CAFE PARTNERS INC: $17k → 11%RUMBA ROOM LIVE ANAHEIM LLC: $25k → 10%998 Valencia LLC: $25k → 10%MIKE AND MARCIE INC: $43k → 14%For The Funk Of It Productions: $10k → 18%Play Enterprise LLC: $15k → 9%National Independent Venue Association: $43k → 17%THE PARISH AUSTIN LLC: $25k → 10%The House of Songs: $15k → 8%NICE GUYS PINTS & PIES LLC: $25k → 11%The Orange Peel Social Aid and Pleasure Club LLC: $13k → 12%Lulu's Downstairs LLC: $15k → 9%Clocktower Entertainment LLC: $20k → 12%Happy Dog: $25k → 17%MA Wells Enterprises LLC: $25k → 9%THE ROXEY BALLET COMPANY INC: $25k → 4%THE HOLLAND PROJECT: $15k → 10%Fuzz Box Productions LLC: $15k → 9%ISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC: $15k → 17%Montford Park Players Inc: $7k → 12%Club Q LLC: $25k → 9%HQ Live Denver Inc: $25k → 12%EWRB LLC dba No Class: $15k → 17%NATIONAL INDEPENDENT VENUE ASSOCIATION: $525k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AR
NC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GIVING BACK FUND — $1,923,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING BACK FUNDNATIONAL INDEPENDENT VENUE ASSOCIATION — $567,788 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL INDEPENDENT …MIKE AND MARCIE INC — $42,500 · OtherMIKE AND MARCIE…NICE GUYS PINTS & PIES — $25,000 · OtherNICE GUYS PINTS…998 Valencia LLC — $25,000 · Other998 Valencia LL…MA Wells Enterprises LLC — $25,000 · OtherMA Wells Enterp…THE PARISH AUSTIN — $25,000 · OtherTHE PARISH AUST…Club Q LLC — $25,000 · OtherClub Q LLCNE CO BOARD OF COOP EDUC SVS — $25,000 · OtherNE CO BOARD OF …Happy Dog — $25,000 · OtherHappy DogRUMBA ROOM LIVE ANAHEIM LLC — $25,000 · OtherRUMBA ROOM LIVE…GRANADA THEATER LLC — $23,500 · OtherGRANADA THEATER…Clocktower Entertainment LLC — $20,000 · OtherCLUB CAFE PARTNERS INC — $16,500 · OtherEWRB LLC dba No Class — $15,000 · OtherLulu's Downstairs LLC — $15,000 · OtherFUZZ BOX PRODUCTIONS LLC — $15,000 · OtherPlay Enterprise LLC — $15,000 · Other+3 more — $29,000 · Other+3 moreTHE ROXEY BALLET COMPANY — $25,000 · Arts & CultureISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HOLLAND PROJECT — $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe House of Songs — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$1,923,000Community Improvement$567,788Other$391,500Arts & Culture$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $1,923,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL INDEPENDENT VENUE ASSOCIATION — $567,788 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE ROXEY BALLET COMPANY — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HOLLAND PROJECT — $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND
  • Who funds NATIONAL INDEPENDENT VENUE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE ROXEY BALLET COMPANY
  • Who funds ISSUE PROJECT ROOM INC
  • Who funds THE HOLLAND PROJECT
  • Who funds The House of Songs
  • Who funds MONTFORD PARK PLAYERS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Independent Venue Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Roxey Ballet Company11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Independent Venue Foundation?

Find your warmest path to National Independent Venue Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph