Loading…
Loading…
Nebraska · Nonprofit
RABBLE MILL (Nebraska) is funded by 42 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $7,728,748 in grants to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($4,382,090). 28 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
RABBLE MILL runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,451 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,451 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 19%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
96% of RABBLE MILL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 2 funders to 4 as grant income moved $57k → $2.7M.
6 of 42 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of RABBLE MILL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 42 funders by total. Association, not causation.
RABBLE MILL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 67% · 2019 48% · 2020 21% · 2021 23% · 2022 20% · 2023 51% · 2024 51% · 2025 95% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
52% of RABBLE MILL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
RABBLE MILL is locally rooted: 78% of its grant income comes from Nebraska funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 42 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
83% of spending goes to programs.
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 42funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing