Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of TODD AND MARY HEISTAND FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k41 grants · $925k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$922k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SINC$300,000
THRIVING FAMILIES ALLIANCE$145,000
BUILDING BLOCKS ACADEMY$84,500
LUTHERNA SERVICES OF NEBRASKA$75,000
FOODBANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$75,000
CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER$70,000
OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$70,000
TOGETHER INC OMAHA$70,000
HEART MINISTRY CENTER$65,000
GO BEYOND NEBRASKA$60,000
SHARE MY SMILE$55,000
YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES$53,000
KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS$50,000
CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY NEBRASKA$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 12%SHARE MY SMILE: $64k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 12%SHARE MY SMILE: $55k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 12%SHARE MY SMILE: $41k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $35k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%FAMILY INC: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $20k → 12%CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $20k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $25k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $25k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $50k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $30k → 12%MAYS FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $20k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $35k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $35k → 12%MOMMENTUM: $20k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $77k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $70k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $39k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $35k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $30k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $23k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $20k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $70k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $70k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $53k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $50k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $40k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $38k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $38k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $30k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
IA
PA
CO
NE
MO

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.1M · 80 repeat orgs$871k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

80 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
66

Total granted

$8.1M
$547k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

71%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YE
    YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $285k · revenue +109%
  • OB
    OMAHA BY DESIGN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $246k · revenue +224%
  • KC
    KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $235k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASK
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WC
    WOODBINE COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $34k
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCNT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2024 · $31k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
3
Nebraska Youth Center

The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.

—
4
Hope Haven Inc

As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.

—
5
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

—
6
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Hopespoke

Hopespoke is dedicated to meeting the mental health needs of children and their families in the lincoln area and surrounding communities through effective and flexible therapeutic partnerships and a commitment to advocacy and positive…

Health
8
Voices for Children in Nebraska

Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.

—
9
Cornerhouse

The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal
10
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
11
Omaha ForUs Inc

Omaha forus builds intentional community and creates equitable space in service to lgbtq+ individuals and families of eastern nebraska and western iowa.

Human Services
12
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Susan Laflesche Picotte Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%1%<5yr14%18%5–10yr18%30%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr19%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%30%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr19%22%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%4/101
the rest of the field
10%
451/4,381

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/98
Grantees still filing
62/98
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SINC — $1,510,000 · OtherSINCTHRIVING FAMILIES ALLIANCE — $285,000 · OtherTHRIVING FAMILIES ALLIANCEFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $176,500 · OtherAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $163,722 · Other+103 more — $2,473,209 · Other+103 moreHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $394,200 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICEYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC — $285,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INCKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $235,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTERFAMILY INC — $195,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY INCSHARE MY SMILE — $180,000 · Human ServicesSHARE MY SMILECHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $162,500 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INCOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC — $124,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $109,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER — $100,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $80,000 · Human Services+20 more — $533,534 · Human Services+20 moreGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA — $162,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDS — $99,000 · Youth DevelopmentBANISTER'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BIKE UNION MENTORING PROJECT — $50,000 · Youth Development+4 more — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $422,500 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $81,156 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $55,000 · Housing & ShelterFURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA — $40,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterOMAHA BY DESIGN — $245,500 · Arts & CultureOmaha Children's Museum — $75,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $10,100 · Arts & CultureCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY — $162,000 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $60,000 · Crime & LegalCONCORD MEDIATION CENTER — $15,000 · Crime & LegalHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $165,000 · Food & NutritionNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK — $55,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,608,431Human Services$2,398,234Youth Development$636,000Housing & Shelter$603,656Arts & Culture$330,600Crime & Legal$237,000Food & Nutrition$220,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $422,500 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $394,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC — $285,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetOMAHA BY DESIGN — $245,500 over 7y, 18% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $235,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY INC — $195,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetSHARE MY SMILE — $180,000 over 6y, 75% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $176,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $165,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $163,722 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $162,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA — $162,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY — $162,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetGO BEYOND NEBRASKA — $150,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetCarole's House of Hope — $138,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $130,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC — $124,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $109,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER — $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS — $99,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING BLOCKS ACADEMY — $90,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $81,156 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBANISTER'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $80,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VISITING NURSE HEALTH SERVICES — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum — $75,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOMentum — $65,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSIMPLE FOUNDATION — $57,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK — $55,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BIKE UNION MENTORING PROJECT — $50,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWINGS OF REFUGE — $47,069 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $46,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRABBLE MILL — $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFURNITURE PROJECT OMAHA — $40,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetANGELS AMONG US — $39,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALL CARE HEALTH CENTER — $39,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $37,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC — $33,465 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES — $32,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT HOUSEWORKS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE — $29,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA BY DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE MY SMILE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GO BEYOND NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds Carole's House of Hope ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BLOCKS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BANISTER'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds THE VISITING NURSE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds MOMentum ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…The Hawks FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…Weitz Family Foundati…Suzanne & Walter Scot…United Way of the Mid…Leland J & Dorothy H …The Charles and Mary …Immanuel Community Vi…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Gilbert M and Martha …
The Lozier FoundationNE123.2× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines