· Private foundation
Cooper Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $862k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN EN THOMPSON FORUM ON WORLD ISSUES | $80,398 |
| UNITED WAY OF LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY | $39,000 |
| NEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $27,000 |
| CLYDE MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR PEOPLE | $25,000 |
| BRAVEBE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $25,000 |
| THE HUB CENTRAL ACCESS POINT FOR YOUNG ADULTS | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF LANCASTER AND SAUNDERS COUNTY | $25,000 |
| RABBLE MILL DBA THE BAY | $25,000 |
| NEBRASKA ARTS COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CORP | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE ADVANCEMENT | $25,000 |
| HOPE SPOKE | $25,000 |
| INDIAN CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| HUMANITIES NEBRASKA | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
111 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMALONE COMMUNITY CENTER7× · 2019–2025 · $240k · revenue ×19
- RMRABBLE MILL5× · 2019–2023 · $230k · revenue +379%
- LCLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER5× · 2019–2025 · $93k · revenue +156%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN PLATTE BASIN TIMELAPSEone grant, 2019 · $50k
- LPLINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2022 · $30k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN COLLEGE OF JOURNALISM AND MASS COMMUNICATIOone grant, 2022 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.
Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential
The organization's mission is to expand the world of possibilities for aging through advocacy, collaboration, and education.
To Market Lincoln as the area of choice in which to live and do business, by attracting, assisting, retaining and promoting our members
The mission of the nebraska state education association is to advocate for all education professionals, emplowering them to provide an excellent public education for every student.
The organization's purpose is to ensure a fair and modern democracy in nebraska through research, education, and advocacy for policies and practices that promote participation in democracy.
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
Promotion of tourism, business, industry and history in the community of nebraska city, ne
Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.
The mission of the urban league of nebraska is to be an empowering voice in the community advocating for economic self-reliance, parity, power, civil rights and equal opportunity for all (see schedule o). the vision of the urban league of…
To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.
Community development in lincoln, ne
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Civic Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Voz De Esperanza. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MALONE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RABBLE MILL ↗
- Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds CIVIC NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF LINCOLN ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HOPESPOKE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE SOLIDAGO CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds DOANE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GIVE NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA WRITERS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ↗
- Who funds Mid-America Arts Alliance ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INDIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA INDIAN CHILD WELFARE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CROPS ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Sherwood Foundation · Abel Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · D F Dillon Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · Nebraska Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cooper Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cooper Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cooper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.