Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY

PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY (Ohio) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $927,251 to it, the largest being THE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC ($251,462). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.1M
Funders on record
26
Grants received
$927k
Net assets
$1.5M
12/26 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Project Woman of Springfield & Clark County does

Mission

Project woman is dedicated to ending domestic violence and sexual assualt by providing services and programs to protect, educate, adn empower.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Domestic violence - services and programs tht protect educate and empower, ultimately promoting selfsufficiency for those who are served. A 365 day a year emergency shelter/safe house is staffed 24 hours a day seven days a week where women and their children can stay for up to 60 days. A crisis line is also staffed 24 hours a day to provide support for callers that need someone to listen, referral information, or are seeking assistance from abusive homes. Project woman provides victim and hospital advocacy, a domestic violence enhanced response team and children programming in order to combat domestic violence. Presentations are made to schools, organizations and businesses about domestic violence, sexual assualt and healthy relationships in order to provide outreach and prevention services.

    $1,407,719 spent
    74% of program spending
  2. Transitional housing - housing for women and their children who have been afftected by domestick violence. Women learn recovery skills, master educational and job skills and experince employment in a supportive environment. Supportive services include case coordination, referrals to service providers, transportation to necessary appointments and placement in permanent housing.

    $240,263 spent
    13% of program spending
  3. Behavioral health - includes services that diagnoses, treats and prevents behavioral health issues.

    $252,215 spent
    13% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,900,197.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 104 ($1.8M) Expenses 130 ($1.9M) Net assets 93 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 101 ($1.8M) Expenses 128 ($1.8M) Net assets 87 ($1.0M)2020 Revenue 99 ($1.7M) Expenses 120 ($1.7M) Net assets 87 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 96 ($1.7M) Expenses 119 ($1.7M) Net assets 87 ($1.0M)2022 Revenue 115 ($2.0M) Expenses 134 ($1.9M) Net assets 93 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 97 ($1.7M) Expenses 122 ($1.8M) Net assets 88 ($1.0M)2024 Revenue 140 ($2.4M) Expenses 130 ($1.9M) Net assets 137 ($1.6M)2025 Revenue 120 ($2.1M) Expenses 152 ($2.2M) Net assets 129 ($1.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (120)Expenses (152)Net assets (129)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.2M to $1.8M (+42%).

$1.3M
$1.4M
$1.2M
$1.4M
$1.4M
$1.5M
$1.2M
$1.8M
$1.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 80% · 2018 80% · 2019 80% · 2020 78% · 2021 48% · 2022 36% · 2023 46% · 2025 26%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

81% of PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$305k
’17
−$54k
’18
−$78k
’19
$1k
’20
−$38k
’21
$76k
’22
−$62k
’23
$565k
’24
−$94k
’25
1.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Brooke Wagner

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1110810889911
Joined·+1+1+4+2+4+1+0+10
No longer listed·23244008
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 12 funders, grant income rose $43k → $89k.

7 of 26 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 24% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 25 of 26 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY.

27%
largest funder
55%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 56% · 2019 78% · 2020 27% · 2021 32% · 2022 27% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 46% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

80% of PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

NH
OH
CA
DE
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $226k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY's funding base is broadening — from 4 funders to 12 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−4% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.6M on record.

Federal$1.6M
grants $1.6Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$865k
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$783k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 14%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Chrysalis Manor LLC · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY?
PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY (Ohio) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $927,251 to it, the largest being THE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC ($251,462). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY have?
IRS filings report 26 organizations giving $927,251 in grants to PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY?
THE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $251,462 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Project Woman of Springfield & Clark County →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 26 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing