· Public charity
The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc
Increase the organized capacity for people to care for one another.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $564,959 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $850,635 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $285,676 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $382k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF | $84,999 |
| SPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $59,185 |
| WELLSPRING | $44,653 |
| PROJECT WOMAN OF OHIO | $42,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF | $31,500 |
| DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD | $29,500 |
| CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION | $26,000 |
| CARING KITCHEN INC | $23,660 |
| CAREERCONNECTED | $20,000 |
| LIFECARE ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| CLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH | $18,671 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF | $17,500 |
| CLARK COUNTY DEPT OF REENTRY | $16,250 |
| LONDON CITY SCHOOLS | $15,000 |
| ROCKING HORSE COMMUNITY HEALTH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $894k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISHELTERED INC8× · 2017–2024 · $808k · revenue +28%
- WWELLSPRING9× · 2017–2025 · $707k · revenue +4%
- RHROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $379k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- FGFULL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES AND MINISTERS INTL INCone grant, 2024 · $22k
- VUVARIOUS ( UNDER 4000)one grant, 2023 · $12k
- TBTCN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INCone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…
To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.
Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges Community Action Partnership and the most unlike its peers is Madison County Community Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHELTERED INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING ↗
- Who funds ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
- Who funds OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Community Mercy Health Partners ↗
- Who funds Caring Kitchen Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds OESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MCKINLEY HALL INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A ↗
- Who funds ON-THE-RISE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD ↗
- Who funds ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds TECUMSEH COUNCIL 439 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Cancer Association of Champaign County ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
- Who funds THE LOVING CARE HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR CLARK CO INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SPRINGFIELD ↗
- Who funds CONSOLIDATED CARE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Dayton Foundation Depository · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust · Crabill Family Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Walter S Quinlan Foundation · United Way of Logan County Inc · Park National Corporation Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.