Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Walter S Quinlan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$628k
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$157k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Walter S Quinlan Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Springfield Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 15 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Walter S Quinlan Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $628k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
9
18
12
19
13
20
11
21
13
22
11
23
13
24
15
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$2.4MArts & Culture$954kEducation$786kHealth$351kCommunity Improvement$304kRecreation & Sports$272kEnvironment$173kHuman Services$155kOther$0
02FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k19 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $413k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION$156,508
SPRINGFORWARD$125,000
WHITTENBERG UNIVERSITY$67,000
SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART$64,000
WESCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION$32,500
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD OH$25,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY$23,500
THE GAMMON HOUSE$20,000
OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE$15,000
SNYDER PARK GARDENS-ARBORETUM$12,500
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NE NEW YORK$10,000
RIDGEWOOD SCHOOL$5,000
PROJECT WOMEN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PROJECT WOMAN: $25k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 41 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
3

Total granted

$3.0M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

34%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $301k · revenue +104% · 32% of their budget
  • WH
    WESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +19%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • NT
    NATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • SP
    SNYDER PARK GARDENS
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfield College

The mission of springfield college is to educate students in spirit, mind and body for leadership in service to others by building on a foundation of the college's humanics philosophy, academic excellence, service, and student success.…

Education
2
Springfield Daily Citizen Inc

The mission of the springfield daily citizen is to inform our community and be a catalyst for good.

Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Preservation Association

To empower and educate people to value, preserve and save greater cincinnati's historic buildings, communities, landscapes and stories.

Arts & Culture
4
Springfield Museums Corporation

The springfield museums corporation is a non-profit organization which holds and cares for collections in the fields of art, history, and science and makes them accessible for educational, recreational and informational purposes to a…

Education
5
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

6
Springmont School Inc

Springmont provides a learning environment where diversity of thought and global perspective empower students to be inquisitive, knowledgeable, independent, compassionate and effective.

7
Springfield Historic Landmark Preservation Foundation Inc

To preserve and protect historic buildings in and around springfield, ohio, including specifically the clubhouse and golf course deemed historically and/or architecturally significant of springfield county club, in order to perpetuate the…

Arts & Culture
8
Community Improvement Corporation of Springfield-Clark County

Economic development of springfield and clark county ohio.

Community Improvement
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

10
Springfield Ballet Inc

Dedicated to advancing the art of ballet through premier education, performance, outreach and collaberation.

Arts & Culture
11
The Democracy Collaborative Foundation Inc

See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…

Education
12
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield Museum of Art and the most unlike its peers is Stamford Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr11%4%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr14%9%20–35yr17%26%35–55yr20%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr11%1%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%5%20–35yr17%10%35–55yr20%73%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
11%
428/3,737

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $2,406,538 · PhilanthropyTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATIONWHITTENBERG UNIVERSITY — $327,000 · OtherWHITTENBERG UNIVERSITYSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $301,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUN…ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY — $280,500 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION — $200,000 · OtherNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATIONCOMMUNITY MERCY FOUNDATION — $110,000 · OtherSNYDER PARK GARDENS-ARBORETUM — $93,500 · OtherSOUTH FOUNTAIN PRESERVATION INC — $82,500 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $82,000 · Other+37 more — $608,500 · Other+37 moreSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $436,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM O…SPRINGFORWARD — $275,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFORWARDWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION — $181,250 · Arts & CultureWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUND…GAMMON HOUSE INC — $122,500 · Arts & CultureGAMMON HOUSE INC+1 more — $13,500 · Arts & CultureNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $79,500 · EnvironmentCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $40,750 · EducationUniversity of Dayton — $22,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $13,500 · EducationRIDGEWOOD SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · EducationDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $70,000 · HealthPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $25,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $5,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,406,538Other$2,085,000Arts & Culture$1,028,250Environment$79,500Education$79,250Health$70,000Human Services$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $2,406,538 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $436,000 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $301,000 over 9y, 32% of budgetSPRINGFORWARD — $275,000 over 4y, 53% of budgetWESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION — $181,250 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetGAMMON HOUSE INC — $122,500 over 7y, 64% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $79,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $40,750 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSpringfield Arts Council Inc — $28,750 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetON-THE-RISE — $15,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCHAMPAIGN AVIATION MUSEUM — $13,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStamford Library — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRIDGEWOOD SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPRINGFORWARD
  • Who funds WESTCOTT HOUSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GAMMON HOUSE INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION
  • Who funds Springfield Arts Council Inc
  • Who funds OHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
  • Who funds PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY
  • Who funds University of Dayton
  • Who funds ON-THE-RISE
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN AVIATION MUSEUM
  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield FoundationOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Assurant Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · Crabill Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Tiller Family Foundation · Taj Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Walter S Quinlan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Walter S Quinlan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Walter S Quinlan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph