Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crabill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Education$3.8MArts & Culture$873kHealth$599kPhilanthropy$370kHousing & Shelter$270kHuman Services$178kFood & Nutrition$150kInternational$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $299k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $800k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$131M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$1,100,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD INC$150,000
YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$100,000
CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION$100,000
THE BRANSON SCHOOL$50,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$50,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$50,000
PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY$50,000
SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC$50,000
OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE (OIC) OF CLARK COUNTY$50,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE HARTMAN ROCK GARDEN$25,000
SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
OHIO TRI-COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%PROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD AND CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $25k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT: $20k → 15%CITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO: $1k → 10%OIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC: $50k → 15%OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE (OIC) OF CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
NY
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Crabill Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Crabill Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$5.0M
$781k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+52%

Still filing today

74%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRANSON SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +41%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $300k · revenue +23%
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $224k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • WA
    WALKER ART CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue +155%
  • AH
    ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +22%
  • SF
    SPRINGFIELD FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2020 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
3
Cincinnati Preservation Association

To empower and educate people to value, preserve and save greater cincinnati's historic buildings, communities, landscapes and stories.

Arts & Culture
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
6
IMPACT100 Oakland County

Provide high impact grants to non profits serving oakland county.

—
7
Central Neighborhood Health Foundation

The organization's mission is to minimize disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior-quality, patient-centered healthcare through an integrated delivery system for underserved and vulnerable multi-ethnic…

Health
8
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
9
The Democracy Collaborative Foundation Inc

See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…

Education
10
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is City Hope San Francisco. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%10%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%50%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,936

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BRANSON SCHOOL — $1,900,000 · EducationTHE BRANSON SCHOOLOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD…+5 more — $120,000 · EducationCATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR BOYS — $1,064,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL SCHOOL FOR BOYSSPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $162,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTCLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH DISTRICT — $90,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $75,000 · OtherCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $75,000 · Other+20 more — $408,500 · Other+20 moreWALKER ART CENTER — $350,000 · Arts & CultureWALKER ART C…SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $160,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD …ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMME…SPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIELD …SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $40,000 · Arts & CultureCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $30,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $110,000 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $223,685 · HealthROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER — $150,000 · HealthMCKINLEY HALL INC — $15,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $160,000 · Community Improvement1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $74,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CONSCIOUS CONNECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $7,500 · Community ImprovementOPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $75,000 · Human ServicesCITILOOKOUT — $70,000 · Human Services+2 more — $3,500 · Human Services
Education$2,620,000Other$1,975,000Arts & Culture$755,000Philanthropy$480,000Health$388,685Community Improvement$256,500Human Services$248,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BRANSON SCHOOL — $1,900,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER — $350,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $223,685 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $160,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $160,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER — $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CHANGE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $74,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetCITILOOKOUT — $70,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE — $50,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Dayton Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HARTMAN ROCK GARDEN — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGREATER OHIO POLICY CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGLEN HELEN ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CONSCIOUS CONNECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $7,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HOPE SAN FRANCISCO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield Found…Community Hospital He…Della Selsor Tr UwHarry and Violet Turn…Wilson Sheehan Founda…The United Way of Cla…Assurant FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Walter S Quinlan Foun…Park National Corpora…The Dayton FoundationColumbus Foundation
The Springfield FoundationOH40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Assurant Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Walter S Quinlan Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Columbus Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crabill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines