Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Hospital Health Services Foundation

To preserve reproductive services, to promote health and wellness and to advocate for quality healthcare through grant making and education.

$569k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.6MHuman Services$289kYouth Development$206kFood & Nutrition$178kEducation$139kCommunity Improvement$130kPhilanthropy$86kCrime & Legal$47kArts & Culture$10kOther$688k
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 27 grants below total $432,225 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $569,442 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $137,217 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $232k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $143k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKING HORSE CENTER$87,000
CLARK COUNTY COMBINED HEALTH DISTRICT$56,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$31,800
SPRINGFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$18,500
CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$15,500
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
SPRINGFIELD PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD$13,500
JEFFERSON STREET OASIS$13,500
BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION$13,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$13,000
HOPE$13,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
SPRINGFIELD FOUNDATION$10,000
ON-THE-RISE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS: $10k → 14%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS MIAMI VALLEY CHAPTER: $8k → 14%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 10%catholic charities: $10k → 16%CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 16%PROJECT WOMAN: $30k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $25k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $18k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $11k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $10k → 15%project woman: $9k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $9k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%PROJECT WOMAN: $8k → 15%CITILOOKOUT COUNSELING CENTER: $6k → 15%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $8k → 15%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES: $8k → 15%PRECIOUS GIFTS DAYCARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $11k → 15%good samaritan outreach center of springfield: $6k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $15k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 42 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
21

Total granted

$3.2M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+0%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $821k · revenue +105%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $496k · revenue +241% · 71% of their budget
  • SH
    SHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $152k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • SI
    SPRINGFIELD INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • SC
    Springfield City Schools
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • PG
    PRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Improvement Corporation of Springfield-Clark County

Economic development of springfield and clark county ohio.

Community Improvement
2
Springvale Health Centers Inc

Provide high quality integrated healthcare services to consumers and agencies primarily in tuscarawas and carroll counties.

Health
3
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
4
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
6
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
7
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
8
Clark Community Mental Health Center

Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.

Health
9
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
10
School Choice Ohio Inc

The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.

Education
11
Circle Health Services

Circle Health fights for equity by healing, teaching, and inspiring individuals and families to reach their full potential.

—
12
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield City Youth Mission and the most unlike its peers is The Arthur Morgan Institute for Community Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Economic Developm…Early Childhood Care CentersHospital Systems and Health…Community Grantmaking Found…Independent K-12 SchoolsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Family Philanthropic Founda…Private Membership ClubsAffordable Housing Developm…Behavioral Health Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr17%20%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr21%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr17%6%10–20yr15%35%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr21%14%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/65
the rest of the field
13%
1,987/15,703

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
35/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER — $821,150 · HealthROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTERCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $496,200 · HealthCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION — $107,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC — $103,750 · HealthPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC+6 more — $72,280 · HealthSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC — $152,250 · OtherSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INCSHELTERED INC — $94,250 · OtherSHELTERED INCWELLSPRING — $65,100 · OtherWELLSPRINGSPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT — $59,500 · OtherSPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICTBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $56,250 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF…COMMUNITY MERCY FOUNDATION — $31,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC — $40,730 · OtherTHE BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION — $35,500 · OtherHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CONNECT WITH GOD — $47,000 · OtherHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CO…+21 more — $249,474 · Other+21 morePROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $108,639 · Human ServicesPROJECT W…CITILOOKOUT — $65,500 · Human ServicesCITILOOKO…DISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $28,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT …CHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A — $19,500 · Human ServicesCHAMPAIGN…Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio — $17,500 · Human ServicesCatholic …FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES — $15,000 · Human ServicesPRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER — $10,500 · Human ServicesSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $14,000 · Human ServicesON-THE-RISE — $82,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF DAYTON — $44,250 · Youth DevelopmentSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION — $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts of Western Ohio — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentRULING OUR EXPERIENCES INC — $11,775 · Youth Development+1 more — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $82,800 · Food & NutritionJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN — $47,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $25,000 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE ALLIANCE — $22,500 · Food & NutritionASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE — $62,200 · EducationCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $37,650 · EducationCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $34,500 · EducationCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS — $5,000 · Education1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $90,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $39,500 · Community Improvement
Health$1,600,630Other$831,054Human Services$288,639Youth Development$205,525Food & Nutrition$177,800Education$139,350Community Improvement$129,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROCKING HORSE CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER — $821,150 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCLARK COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $496,200 over 7y, 71% of budgetSHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC — $152,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT WOMAN OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY — $108,639 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION — $107,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC OF CLARK COUNTY INC — $103,750 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetSHELTERED INC — $94,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budget1159 SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $90,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetOHIO TRI COUNTY FOOD ALLIANCE DBA SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $82,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetON-THE-RISE — $82,000 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetCITILOOKOUT — $65,500 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetWELLSPRING — $65,100 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE — $62,200 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SPRINGFIELD INC — $56,250 over 6y, 25% of budgetJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN — $47,500 over 5y, 19% of budgetHELPING OUR YOUNG PEOPLE CONNECT WITH GOD — $47,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF DAYTON — $44,250 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CLARK CHAMPAIGN & MADISON COUNTIES INC — $40,730 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $39,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMCKINLEY HALL INC — $39,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $37,650 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION — $36,500 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetTHE BRAXTON MILLER FOUNDATION — $35,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION — $34,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD OHIO SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $28,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC — $27,120 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMPAIGN FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN A — $19,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $16,800 over 2y, 20% of budgetSIFI MINISTRY dba SAFE HARBOR HOUSE — $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVES — $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRULING OUR EXPERIENCES INC — $11,775 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPRECIOUS GIFTS DAY CARE & LEARNING CENTER — $10,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHER STORY INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARTHUR MORGAN INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECOVERY ZONE — $7,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT SERVICES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National — $6,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTUMN TRAILS STABLE — $6,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGood Samaritan Outreach Center — $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield Found…The United Way of Cla…Della Selsor Tr UwDayton Foundation Dep…Harry and Violet Turn…Wilson Sheehan Founda…The Dayton FoundationCrabill Family Founda…Assurant FoundationCarleton F and Ruth T…Springfield Eagles Ch…The Nehemiah Foundati…
The Springfield FoundationOH86.3× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Dayton Foundation Depository · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Crabill Family Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust · Springfield Eagles Charity Inc · The Nehemiah Foundation of Springfield/Clark County

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Hospital Health Services Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines