Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION

PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,153,819 to it, the largest being HOPEWELL FUND ($231,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$316k
Funders on record
18
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
$85k
12/18 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Pro-Choice Minnesota Foundation does

Mission

To provide education and leadership developments on issues of reproductive rights.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. * student organizing & activist leadership development: for over 20 years, the foundation continues to serve as the state's only pro-choice organization to promote pro-choice activism and citizen involvement on campuses across the state. More than 300 young people have learned essential leadership skills during internships, and we are a leader in developing young activists for the progressive movement. We are currently organized on 13 campuses throughout the state. We bring our student leaders together 3 times a year in st paul, to provide hands on training and resources, and our campus organizers are critical for the recruitment of young people for our pro-choice lobby day, as well as securing electoral victories during election cycles.* lobbying at the legislature to stop anti-choice legislation and supporting pro-active, pregnancy prevention initiatives.* the trust project: this is a women-of-color led initiative which seeks to expand the foundation's presence in underrepresented racial and ethnic communities, while providing education, training and support to the leaders carrying out the work.

    $105,497 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $105,497.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($83k) Expenses 100 ($108k) Net assets 100 ($114k)2018 Revenue 221 ($184k) Expenses 124 ($134k) Net assets 136 ($155k)2019 Revenue 112 ($94k) Expenses 94 ($101k) Net assets 130 ($148k)2020 Revenue 300 ($250k) Expenses 106 ($114k) Net assets 249 ($284k)2021 Revenue 225 ($188k) Expenses 242 ($261k) Net assets 184 ($210k)2022 Revenue 425 ($355k) Expenses 359 ($387k) Net assets 156 ($178k)2023 Revenue 162 ($135k) Expenses 345 ($372k) Net assets -53 ($-59877)2024 Revenue 378 ($316k) Expenses 158 ($170k) Net assets 75 ($85k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (378)Expenses (158)Net assets (75)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $153k to $350k (+129%).

$114k
$158k
$153k
$350k
$278k
$182k
$23k
$140k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 34% · 2022 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$24k
’17
$50k
’18
−$8k
’19
$136k
’20
−$73k
’21
−$33k
’22
−$237k
’23
$145k
’24
9.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Gina Debogovich

Current executive director

Board chair

Hannah Martin

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019, and between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed6781111141211
Joined·+1+2+7+1+4+0+5
No longer listed·0141126
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 10 funders, grant income rose $2k → $190k.

9 of 18 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION.

20%
largest funder
51%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2019 59% · 2020 49% · 2021 59% · 2022 36% · 2023 43% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION draws 75% of its grant income from funders outside Minnesota, across 4 states in all.

MN
OH
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $509k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 23%Fundraising 15%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Pro-Choice Minnesota · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION?
PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 18 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,153,819 to it, the largest being HOPEWELL FUND ($231,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 18 organizations giving $1,153,819 in grants to PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION?
HOPEWELL FUND is the largest funder on record, with $231,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pro-Choice Minnesota →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 18 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing