· Public charity
Minnesota Voice
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $364k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Minnesota Youth Collective Ed Fund | $70,000 |
| COPAL MN | $54,000 |
| Minnesota Student Association | $45,000 |
| MN NORML | $32,000 |
| Somali Community Resettlement Svs | $30,000 |
| Students United | $30,000 |
| Queer Equity Institute | $22,000 |
| Ayada Leads | $22,000 |
| Minnesota Youth Collectove | $20,000 |
| Lead MN | $20,000 |
| NACDI | $16,200 |
| Alliance for a Better MN Ed Fund | $15,000 |
| Tone Up | $15,000 |
| YMCA Center for Youth Voice | $15,000 |
| Minnesota Unitarian Universalist SJ | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $513k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $382k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ANIKA FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $234k · revenue +298% · 31% of their budget
- NANative American Community Development Institute4× · 2020–2024 · $204k · revenue +71%
- BCBLACK CIVIC NETWORK5× · 2018–2022 · $198k · revenue +160% · 36% of their budget
Funded once
- IISAIAHgraduated3× · 2020–2022 · $145k · revenue +86%
- TPTHE PEOPLE'S CANVASSone grant, 2022 · $56k
- AAAOP3× · 2020–2022 · $55k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
To develop and advocate for public policy that makes Minnesota's economy more prosperous and fair for all Minnesotans.
The Coalition of Asian American Leaders (CAAL) is a network organization of Asian Minnesotan leaders harnessing our collective power to improve the lives of community.
We specialize in using digital and social media, media relations, and original content like videos, graphics, and blogs to increase support for progressive ideals. Together, we can build a Minnesota that works for everyone.
Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.
To represent victim/survivors of relationship abuse and member programs; challenge systems and institutions; promote social change; and support, educate, and connect member programs.
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
The Minnesota Leadership Council on Aging is uniting leaders to advance equitable opportunities for all Minnesotans as we age.
Minneapolis Climate Action is a 501c(3) nonprofit founded in 2007 by a group of dedicated individuals committed to addressing climate change in their community. After almost 10 years of working at the neighborhood level and piloting the…
Sahan Journal provides immigrants and communities of color with free, fair, and responsive journalism that shows everyone the way to a more equitable Minnesota.
Protect Minnesota promotes a culture of health and safety for all Minnesotans by preventing gun violence through research education advocacy and community investment. We emphasize prevention using a public health model and we seek to build…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmong American Partnership and the most unlike its peers is African American Interpretive Center of Minnesota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Minnesota NORML ↗
- Who funds THE ANIKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Native American Community Development Institute ↗
- Who funds BLACK CIVIC NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CAREER EDUCATION & RESOURCES IN ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH ↗
- Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Minnesota State College Student Association Inc ↗
- Who funds AYADA LEADS ↗
- Who funds New American Development Cente ↗
- Who funds TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds GrassRoots In Action ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HMONG ARTS AND TALENT ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA YOUTH COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MN350 ↗
- Who funds GENDER JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds COPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY STUDENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds OPEN ACCESS CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Student Association ↗
- Who funds PRO-CHOICE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A Mothers Love Initiative ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN OIC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERY CHILD MATTERS EDUCATION F UND INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PEOPLE OF COLOR LGBT PRIDE ↗
- Who funds HMONG AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Somali Community Resettlement ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA YOUTH COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Women For Political Action Change Education & Advo ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MINNESOTA EDUC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Women's Foundation of Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Alliance for Metropolitan Stability · Still Ain'T Satisfied - a Foundation With Attitude (Sas) · Takeaction Mn Education Fund · Northwest Area Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Minnesota Voice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Minnesota Voice?
Find your warmest path to Minnesota Voice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.