Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Franz Bakery Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$271kFood & Nutrition$210kHealth$123kYouth Development$91kHousing & Shelter$62kEducation$44kAnimals$27kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$814k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$3,000
ELKS LODGE 1087$3,000
POVERELLO CENTER$3,000
CHARLESTON FISHING FAMILIES$3,000
COURTHOUSE DOGS FOUNDATION$3,000
GIG HARBOR WOMENS CO-OP$3,000
CAMPBELL SAFE HAVEN RESCUE AND REHA$3,000
VITAL VILLAGES$3,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK- SOUTH C$3,000
BLOOMIN BOUTIQUE$3,000
IRIS CLUBHOUSE$3,000
STAR FOOD BANK$3,000
MAKING A DIFFERENCE$3,000
CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUPPORT AND TECHNIQUES FOR EMPOWERI: $3k → 9%GLOBAL DOING GOOD: $3k → 10%KAIROS YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 14%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 11%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $3k → 10%SHARING HANDS FOOD BANK: $3k → 13%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER: $3k → 5%CANYON CREEK SERVICES: $3k → 13%TURN THE TABLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%Safe Harbor Crisis Nursery: $3k → 11%BLUE SKIES FOR CHILLDREN: $3k → 12%Woodland Action Center: $3k → 13%VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 16%RISE NETWORK: $3k → 16%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $3k → 17%Council on Aging & Human Svcs: $3k → 20%ALASKA FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 10%THE WORKSHOP: $3k → 10%PEACE PLACE: $3k → 14%SISKIYOU FOOD ASSISTANCE: $3k → 16%FEEDING HAWAII TOGETHER: $3k → 9%BLOOMIN BOUTIQUE: $3k → 8%SAVING GRACE: $3k → 10%BURRITO BRIGADE: $3k → 15%THE SAFE PROJECT: $3k → 17%RYANS HOUSE FOR YOUTH: $3k → 7%CHILDCARE ACTION COUNCIL: $3k → 9%KIDS KUPBOARD: $3k → 22%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $3k → 11%PEACE PLACE: $3k → 14%IBOUNCE UP: $3k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 8%BAGS OF LOVE: $3k → 15%BREMERTON BACKPACK BRIGADE: $3k → 10%Blue Skies for Children: $3k → 12%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $3k → 17%KIDS KUPBOARD: $3k → 10%CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $3k → 11%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $3k → 11%Tumbleweed: $3k → 9%GREEN LENTS: $3k → 12%Family Building Blocks Inc: $3k → 14%HOSEA YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 15%LIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $3k → 9%RAYS FOR RARE: $3k → 8%JEMFRIENDS INC: $3k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $3k → 8%BIRTHDAY DREAMS: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
OR
WY
CA
UT
AZ
NC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$209k · 39 repeat orgs$871k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
289

Total granted

$209k
$751k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

87%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +32%
  • CG
    CODE GIRLS UNITED
    3× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +391%
  • LK
    LIFES KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GIVING CUPBOARD
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -64%
  • TB
    The Big Table
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • EC
    ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
2
Recovery Cafe Skagit

Provide a safe, healing, and restorative community that empowers long-term transformation through human connection for those recovering from the trauma of homelessness, addictions, and mental health challenges.

Education
3
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
5
One Life

To feed and equip people in our community to break cycles of poverty. We do this through our shopping style food pantry our giving garden nutrition education program and our homeless care program.

Human Services
6
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
7
Family Promise of Tualatin Valley

To provide families and individuals experiencing homelessness temporary emergency shelter with intensive case management support while they work toward the goal of safe, stable and affordable housing.

Human Services
8
Eat Happy Now

Eat Happy's mission revolves around rescuing perfectly healthy food that would otherwise be discarded and ending up in landfills.

Food & Nutrition
9
Operation Nightwatch - Portland

Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…

Health
10
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
11
Nooksack Valley Food Bank Association

Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.

Food & Nutrition
12
Sisters Cold Weather Shelter

SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center and the most unlike its peers is Doughty Home for Veteran Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and ShelterChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Military Veterans SupportDomestic Violence ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Youth Mentoring ProgramsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Food PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsSenior Support ServicesYouth Development CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/255
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,310

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

227 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 227 of the 368 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
64
Early backer (in before they grew)
222/227
Grantees still filing
143/227
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+115 more — $359,500 · Other+115 moreBLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN — $8,000 · Human ServicesPEACE PLACE — $6,000 · Human ServicesBirthday Dreams — $5,500 · Human Services+43 more — $137,500 · Human Services+43 moreNAMI-Billings — $5,500 · HealthNAMI-Bill…CAMP BLUE SPRUCE — $5,500 · HealthCAMP BLUE…VALLEY CITIES COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION — $5,000 · HealthVALLEY CI…FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $5,000 · HealthFAMILY PR…YOUTH FUTURES — $3,000 · HealthYOUTH FUT…208 RECOVERY NORTH INC — $3,000 · Health208 RECOV…VITAL VILLAGES OR — $3,000 · HealthVITAL VIL…The ISAAC Foundation — $3,000 · HealthThe ISAAC…Iris House Inc — $3,000 · HealthIris Hous…STROPHY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthSTROPHY F…RAINIER FOOTHILLS WELLNESS FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthRAINIER F…RIVER DISCOVERY INC — $3,000 · HealthRIVER DIS…ALS Northwest — $3,000 · HealthALS North…MICHELLES LOVE — $2,500 · HealthCommunity Cancer Services Inc — $2,500 · HealthHope Community Resources Inc — $2,500 · HealthFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC — $5,500 · Food & NutritionFriends of the Quartzsite Food Bank — $5,000 · Food & NutritionHELENA FOOD SHARE INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCharleston Fishing Families — $3,000 · Food & NutritionKITSAP HARVEST — $3,000 · Food & NutritionLIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition1ST PHOENIX COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,500 · Food & NutritionNorth County Community Food Bank — $2,500 · Food & NutritionCODE GIRLS UNITED — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSE — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKSOLID COMMUNITY TEEN CENTER — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentHUB - YOUTH CENTRAL — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentAFTER INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIFES KITCHEN INC — $7,500 · EducationNeeds Beyond Medicine — $5,500 · EducationEDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationKAIROSPDX — $2,500 · EducationCOMMON THREADS FARM — $2,500 · EducationPhinney Neighborhood Association — $5,000 · Community ImprovementTHE GIVING CUPBOARD — $5,000 · Community ImprovementWe Heart Seattle — $2,500 · Community ImprovementSTONE SOUP GROUP — $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$359,500Human Services$157,000Health$55,500Food & Nutrition$29,000Youth Development$23,000Education$21,000Community Improvement$15,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN — $8,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCODE GIRLS UNITED — $7,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLIFES KITCHEN INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE PLACE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNeeds Beyond Medicine — $5,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBirthday Dreams — $5,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARC OF LANE COUNTY — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHarpers Playground — $5,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNAMI-Billings — $5,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCAMP BLUE SPRUCE — $5,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetGleaners of Clackamas County Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAFE PROJECT — $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CITIES COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhinney Neighborhood Association — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrowing Gardens — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTORE TO DOOR — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVING CUPBOARD — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Big Table — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of the Quartzsite Food Bank — $5,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetKids Kupboard — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLatino Network — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST AGAINST HUNGER — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELENA FOOD SHARE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWomen & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetClackamas Service Center — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM ART ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKAIROS YOUTH SERVICES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSKY VALLEY FOOD BANK — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharleston Fishing Families — $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOMIN BOUTIQUE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOur Streets — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAVE DOGS RESCUE — $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget208 RECOVERY NORTH INC — $3,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEISTY FELINES — $3,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Autzen FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Juan Young TrustThe Oregon Community …The Albertsons Compan…The Robert D and Marc…Washington Federal Fo…Puget Sound Energy Fo…The Collins FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…M J Murdock Charitabl…
The Autzen FoundationOR59.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Washington Federal Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Franz Bakery Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Oregon Coast Community Action — 85% of income from government
  • Arc of Lane County — 79% of income from government
  • Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • The Safe Project — 54% of income from government
  • Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Green Lents — 38% of income from government
  • Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Working Theory Farm — 19% of income from government
  • Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
  • Latino Network — 15% of income from government
  • Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
  • The Geezer Gallery — 13% of income from government
  • Laurel Hill Center — 10% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
  • Clackamas Service Center — 9% of income from government
  • The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
  • Open School Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children-Portland — 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
  • Artist Mentorship Program — 2% of income from government
  • Salem Art Association — 1% of income from government
  • Bridges Middle School — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 368 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines