Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT

MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,267,019 to it, the largest being Woka Foundation ($750,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.2M
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
$854k
7/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 53%
01What it does

What Mangrove Action Project does

Mission

MAP's mission is to partner with communities and organizations worldwide to conserve, manage, and restore mangrove forests. Through science, training, and environmental education, we provide nature-based solutions for people and our planet.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. MAP continued to expand its global reach, delivering hands-on and virtual Community-Based Ecological Mangrove Restoration (CBEMR) training workshops across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, expanding its outreach efforts to raise awareness of mangrove conservation, and continuing its youth education program. MAP held our first CBEMR field training in Mozambique this year, along with our largest-ever workshop in our 32-year history, held in Kenya. MAP expanded its virtual training series, connecting practitioners from El Salvador, Madagascar, and beyond. These sessions extend our reach to restorationists who cannot attend in-person workshops. Our follow-up visits in Kenya and Madagascar allowed us to measure progress, strengthen partnerships, and ensure training outcomes are translating into long-term, community-led restoration success. Our Global Mangrove News publication, now the world's longest-running mangrove-focused news digest, reaches more than 2,200 readers monthly, continuing to provide science-based updates to the international mangrove community. MAP's Coastal Education Program for youth was piloted in Belize, integrating mangrove ecology into local school curricula…

    $568,647 spent$254,506 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $568,647.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($156k) Expenses 100 ($189k) Net assets 100 ($28k)2018 Revenue 82 ($128k) Expenses 73 ($137k) Net assets 65 ($18k)2019 Revenue 89 ($138k) Expenses 72 ($136k) Net assets 71 ($20k)2020 Revenue 98 ($152k) Expenses 82 ($154k) Net assets 64 ($18k)2021 Revenue 198 ($309k) Expenses 133 ($252k) Net assets 369 ($103k)2022 Revenue 434 ($677k) Expenses 238 ($449k) Net assets 1179 ($329k)2023 Revenue 483 ($753k) Expenses 373 ($703k) Net assets 1375 ($384k)2024 Revenue 778 ($1.2M) Expenses 394 ($744k) Net assets 3059 ($854k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (778)Expenses (394)Net assets (3059)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $488k to $933k (+91%).

$28k
$18k
$20k
$79k
$167k
$410k
$488k
$933k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

88% of MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,303 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$33k
’17
−$10k
’18
$2k
’19
−$2k
’20
$58k
’21
$227k
’22
$50k
’23
$470k
’24
6.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Roger de Freitas

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2021202220232024
Listed5658
Joined·+3+1+4
No longer listed·221
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 7 funders, grant income rose $6k → $311k.

6 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

59%
largest funder
79%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 63% · 2020 46% · 2021 40% · 2022 93% · 2023 85% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 41% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 7 states in all.

WI
MA
PA
CA
VA
DE
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $104k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,187 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin39% · top quartile
Months of reserve6.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)34% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,187 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 16%Fundraising 7%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT?
MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT (Washington) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,267,019 to it, the largest being Woka Foundation ($750,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $1,267,019 in grants to MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT?
Woka Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $750,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mangrove Action Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing