Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Woka Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
45
Grants FY2024
40
Organizations funded FY2023
18%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$225,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,000,000
Organizations funded a year
18 to 40
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
15
Total assets, FY2024
$192M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 18% of the organizations Woka Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 16% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving42$13M19%
FY202340$13M18%
FY202235$14M31%
FY202128$10M46%
FY202018$3.5Mn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$45MInternational$6.0MFood & Nutrition$2.8MScience & Tech$648kEducation$325kPhilanthropy$250kHealth$250kSocial Science$200kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NM
KS
DC
HI
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Prime Coalition Inc$4,300,000315%
Green America$4,100,000521%
Climate Foundation$2,540,000586%
Ashoka$2,250,00052%
International Biochar Initiative$1,700,000485%
African Women Rising$1,600,000427%
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc$1,400,00050%
White Buffalo Land Trust$1,350,000514%
Rainforest Action Network$1,250,00043%
Nurturing Minds Inc$1,188,598521%
Show all 33 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 24 recipients with no EIN on record ($19M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Woka Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 6 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 33 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrime Coalition Inc: $4,300,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetGreen America: $4,100,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetClimate Foundation: $2,540,000 over 5y, 86% of budgetAshoka: $2,250,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetInternational Biochar Initiative: $1,700,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetAfrican Women Rising: $1,600,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetNatural Resources Defense Council Inc: $1,400,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWhite Buffalo Land Trust: $1,350,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $1,250,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetNurturing Minds Inc: $1,188,598 over 5y, 21% of budgetDeployus Inc: $1,100,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetMad Agriculture: $1,000,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetThe Land Institute: $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetKakenya Center for Excellence: $950,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $900,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $890,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetVertueLab: $850,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetGreenwave Organization Corp: $825,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetRegenerative Farms Inc: $750,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetMangrove Action Project: $750,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetConservation International Foundation: $740,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMongabay Org Corp: $600,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOil Change International Inc: $550,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetClimate Generation: $500,000 over 2y, 19% of budget350org: $400,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCenter for Climate Integrity: $350,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGoodpower Education Fund Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Regeneration Project: $300,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetRegenerative Agriculture Foundation: $200,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCrowdsourcing Sustainability Incorporated: $182,565 over 2y, 78% of budgetKiss the Ground: $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUIH Family Partners d/b/a The Father Center of New Jersey: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 33.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD23× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Tides Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · The Marisla Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Woka Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woka Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Woka Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Woka Foundation

How much does Woka Foundation give?
Woka Foundation reported 45 grants totaling $12,976,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 40 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Woka Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (80%), International (11%), Food & Nutrition (5%).
Who are Woka Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Prime Coalition Inc ($4.3M), Green America ($4.1M), Climate Foundation ($2.5M).
Does Woka Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 18% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Woka Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Woka Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Impactassetsinc, The Schmidt Family Foundation, Tides Foundation.
Where is Woka Foundation based?
Woka Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woka’s filings →

More from the funding graph