Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Woka Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$45MInternational$6.0MFood & Nutrition$2.8MScience & Tech$648kEducation$325kPhilanthropy$250kHealth$250kSocial Science$200kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+21 grants · $9.0M
$225,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$192M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Green America$1,000,000
New Energy Nexus$1,000,000
Activate$700,000
Elemental Excelerator Elemental Imp$500,000
Ashoka$500,000
African Women Rising$400,000
Global Greengrants$400,000
Rockefeller Family Fund FCOG$400,000
Climate Foundation$400,000
Center for Climate Integrity$350,000
International Biochar Initiative$350,000
Oil Change International$350,000
Individual grant recipient$330,000
Groundswell International$300,000
Agroecology Fund$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The Father Center of New Jersey: $1k → 11%African Women Rising: $400k → 14%African Women Rising: $400k → 14%Prime Coalition: $1.8M → 8%African Women Rising: $400k → 14%Prime Coalition: $1.6M → 8%African Women Rising: $400k → 14%Prime Coalition: $450k → 8%Prime Coalition: $300k → 8%Prime Coalition: $225k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NM
KS
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Woka Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 26% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 23% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Woka Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51M · 44 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
5

Total granted

$51M
$820k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+69%

Still filing today

59%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesScience & TechInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRIME COALITION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4.3M · revenue +57%
  • GREEN AMERICA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +4%
  • CF
    Climate Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +41% · 86% of their budget

Funded once

  • TR
    THE REGENERATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -90%
  • TL
    The Living Lab World Resources Inst
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • C
    CLIMA
    one grant, 2020 · $120k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
2
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
3
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
4
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
5
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
6
Cascade Climate Inc

To accelerate progress in interventions that harness Earths natural systems to stabilize the climate.

Environment
7
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
8
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
9
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
10
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodpower Education Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Regeneration Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%45%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New Energy Nexus — $3,700,000 · OtherNew Energy NexusActivate — $3,525,000 · OtherActivateGreentown — $2,400,000 · OtherGreentownElemental Excelerator Elemental Imp — $1,000,000 · OtherThe Land Institute — $1,000,000 · OtherQuivira — $920,000 · OtherAgroecology Fund — $900,000 · OtherRockefeller Family Fund FCOG — $800,000 · OtherFORGE — $800,000 · OtherMAD AGRICULTURE — $1,000,000 · Other+23 more — $7,245,781 · Other+23 moreInternational Biochar Initiative — $1,700,000 · EnvironmentInternational Biochar Ini…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $1,525,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUNDNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,400,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE…WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $1,350,000 · EnvironmentWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUSTRainforest Action Network — $1,250,000 · EnvironmentRainforest Action NetworkDEPLOYUS INC — $1,100,000 · EnvironmentDEPLOYUS INCCenter for Land-Based Learning — $890,000 · EnvironmentCenter for Land-Based Lea…MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT — $750,000 · EnvironmentMANGROVE ACTION PROJECTCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $740,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONA…MONGABAY ORG CORP — $600,000 · Environment+4 more — $1,250,000 · Environment+4 morePRIME COALITION INC — $4,300,000 · Human ServicesPRIME COALI…AFRICAN WOMEN RISING — $1,600,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN WOM…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesGREEN AMERICA — $4,100,000 · AnimalsNURTURING MINDS INC — $1,188,598 · EducationKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $950,000 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP — $825,000 · EducationCLIMATE GENERATION — $500,000 · EducationClimate Foundation — $2,540,000 · Science & TechVertueLab — $850,000 · Science & TechASHOKA — $2,250,000 · InternationalGroundswell International Inc — $900,000 · International
Other$23,290,781Environment$12,555,000Human Services$5,901,000Animals$4,100,000Education$3,463,598Science & Tech$3,390,000International$3,150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRIME COALITION INC — $4,300,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetGREEN AMERICA — $4,100,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetClimate Foundation — $2,540,000 over 5y, 86% of budgetASHOKA — $2,250,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetInternational Biochar Initiative — $1,700,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetAFRICAN WOMEN RISING — $1,600,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $1,525,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,400,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $1,350,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $1,250,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC — $1,188,598 over 5y, 21% of budgetDEPLOYUS INC — $1,100,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE — $1,000,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetThe Land Institute — $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $950,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetGroundswell International Inc — $900,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning — $890,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetVertueLab — $850,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP — $825,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetRegenerative Farms Inc — $750,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetMANGROVE ACTION PROJECT — $750,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $740,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP — $600,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOil Change International Inc — $550,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCLIMATE GENERATION — $500,000 over 2y, 19% of budget350ORG — $400,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CLIMATE INTEGRITY — $350,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE REGENERATION PROJECT — $300,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCROWDSOURCING SUSTAINABILITY INCORPORATED — $182,565 over 2y, 78% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUIH Family Partners d/b/a The Father Center of New Jersey — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRIME COALITION INC
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA
  • Who funds Climate Foundation
  • Who funds ASHOKA
  • Who funds International Biochar Initiative
  • Who funds AFRICAN WOMEN RISING
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST
  • Who funds Rainforest Action Network
  • Who funds NURTURING MINDS INC
  • Who funds DEPLOYUS INC
  • Who funds MAD AGRICULTURE
  • Who funds The Land Institute
  • Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc
  • Who funds Center for Land-Based Learning
  • Who funds VertueLab
  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP
  • Who funds Regenerative Farms Inc
  • Who funds MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONGABAY ORG CORP
  • Who funds Oil Change International Inc
  • Who funds CLIMATE GENERATION
  • Who funds 350ORG
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CLIMATE INTEGRITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD23× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Tides Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Martha and Hunter Grubb Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · The Marisla Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woka Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 64%
  • Regenerative Farms Inc64% of income from government
  • VertueLab12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woka Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Woka Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph