Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Singing Field Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Environment$1.5MPhilanthropy$231kAnimals$174kArts & Culture$169kHuman Services$152kInternational$57kCivil Rights$38kHousing & Shelter$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $188k
$6,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$25,000
CLEAN WATER FUND$25,000
YALE SCHOOL FOR THE ENVIRONMENT$24,000
LEBANON OPERA HOUSE$16,000
COMMONWEAL$15,000
INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK OF TURTLE ISLAND$12,500
YANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE$10,000
MSPCAANGELL$10,000
NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENTAL FUND$10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK$10,000
AS YOU SOW$10,000
CONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY$10,000
BARGEMUSIC$10,000
COMMUNITY WATER CENTER$7,500
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATIONAL FUND$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAKE PLACID FORUM FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES: $5k → 13%AYNI INSTITUTE: $13k → 16%LAKE PLACID FORUM FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES: $4k → 13%AYNI INSTITUTE: $8k → 16%LAKE PLACID FORUM FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES: $3k → 13%AYNI INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%LAKE PLACID FORUM FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES: $3k → 13%AYNI INSTITUTE: $3k → 16%LAKE PLACID FORUM FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES: $2k → 13%COMMONWEAL: $30k → 8%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $25k → 8%COMMONWEAL: $15k → 8%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $15k → 8%COMMONWEAL: $15k → 8%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $15k → 8%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%R COMMUNITY BIKES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Singing Field Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Singing Field Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 37 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
16

Total granted

$2.1M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+18%

Still filing today

95%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
EnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CLEAN WATER FUND
    6× · 2018–2024 · $395k · revenue +17%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $160k · revenue +4%
  • COMMONWEAL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • PV
    PIONEER VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $31k · revenue +87%
  • CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +5%
  • RS
    Reunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
4
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
5
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
6
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
7
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
10
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
11
Good Work Institute Inc

The charitable activities of the Good Work Institute are designed to strengthen collaboration; address legacies of unequal power; and encourage a transition to regenerative ecological and social systems.

Human Services
12
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is As You Sow and the most unlike its peers is International Child Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,509

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
43/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLEAN WATER FUND — $395,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUNDSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $360,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION — $159,870 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATIONENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK — $76,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORKNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $48,000 · EnvironmentCommunity Water Center — $45,000 · Environment+9 more — $87,500 · Environment+9 moreLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATIONAL FUND — $89,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION…AS YOU SOW — $60,000 · OtherAS YOU SOWDINOSAUR HILL NATURE PRESERVE INC — $38,500 · OtherDINOSAUR HILL NATURE P…BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · OtherYALE SCHOOL FOR THE ENVIRONMENT — $24,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC — $19,000 · OtherTHE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI — $27,500 · OtherTHE LAMBI FUND OF HAIT…VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $20,000 · OtherPIONEER VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $30,754 · OtherPIONEER VALLEY HABITAT…BRIGHTER BOSTON INC — $26,500 · OtherBRIGHTER BOSTON INCRSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC — $22,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC — $19,500 · OtherMovimiento Cosecha Support Network — $17,500 · Other+13 more — $62,500 · Other+13 moreIMPACTASSETSINC — $157,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSE…CONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY INC — $61,842 · PhilanthropyCONFLUENCE…COMMONWEAL — $115,000 · Human ServicesAYNI INSTITUTE INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesLake Placid Forum for the Arts & Humanities Inc — $17,000 · Human ServicesR COMMUNITY BIKES INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $64,000 · AnimalsYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC — $60,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $13,500 · AnimalsBRADDOCK BAY BIRD OBSERVATORY INC — $6,000 · Animals+2 more — $5,000 · AnimalsBARGEMUSIC LTD — $75,000 · Arts & CultureLEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP — $40,000 · Arts & CultureJUNEAU JAZZ & CLASSICS — $17,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL CHILD ART FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Arts & CultureUNDERCURRENT INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $82,500 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · Education
Environment$1,171,370Other$482,254Philanthropy$219,342Human Services$168,500Animals$148,500Arts & Culture$147,000Education$84,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEAN WATER FUND — $395,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $360,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION — $159,870 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $157,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEAL — $115,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $82,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK — $76,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetBARGEMUSIC LTD — $75,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $64,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY INC — $61,842 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC — $60,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetAS YOU SOW — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $48,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Water Center — $45,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP — $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDINOSAUR HILL NATURE PRESERVE INC — $38,500 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $30,754 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI — $27,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetAYNI INSTITUTE INC — $27,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBRIGHTER BOSTON INC — $26,500 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetEARTHSHARE — $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMANGROVE ACTION PROJECT — $24,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetRSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC — $19,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMovimiento Cosecha Support Network — $17,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLake Placid Forum for the Arts & Humanities Inc — $17,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetJUNEAU JAZZ & CLASSICS — $17,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILD ART FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetISLAND PRESS — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetR COMMUNITY BIKES INC — $9,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNDERCURRENT INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBRADDOCK BAY BIRD OBSERVATORY INC — $6,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetBETHESDA GREEN INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetReunion Sportive d'Haiti Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican Sustainable Business Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLakes Region Conservation Trust — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WILDLIFE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ECONOMY COALITION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILWAYS TO YESTERDAY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL GRANTMAKERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEAL ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BARGEMUSIC LTD ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CONFLUENCE PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds YANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AS YOU SOW ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Water Center ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON OPERA HOUSE IMPROVEMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds DINOSAUR HILL NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBI FUND OF HAITI ↗
  • Who funds AYNI INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHSHARE ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE SHALOMWAHAT AL-SALAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Movimiento Cosecha Support Network ↗
  • Who funds Lake Placid Forum for the Arts & Humanities Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUNEAU JAZZ & CLASSICS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds Water for South Sudan Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILD ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND PRESS ↗
  • Who funds R COMMUNITY BIKES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincAmalgamated Charitabl…Threshold FoundationSurdna Foundation IncThe Ford FoundationCenter for Economic D…The William & Flora H…Boston Foundation IncNovo FoundationTides FoundationProteus Fund IncNew Venture Fund
ImpactassetsincMD21.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Threshold Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Center for Economic Democracy Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Novo Foundation · Tides Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · New Venture Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Singing Field Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Brighter Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Singing Field Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Singing Field Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines