· Public charity
Fair Work Center
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Al Noor Islamic Center | $62,500 |
| Somali Community Services | $62,500 |
| Grassroots Power Project | $50,000 |
| Northwest Immigrant Rights Project | $34,772 |
| Colectiva Legal del Pueblo | $12,944 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $789k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- QPQueer Power Alliance4× · 2020–2023 · $274k · revenue +173% · 30% of their budget
- SCSOMALI COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SEATTLE5× · 2020–2024 · $268k · revenue +44%
- PIPARTNER IN EMPLOYMENT2× · 2020–2021 · $239k · revenue +148%
Funded once
- LCLatino Community Fund of Washington Stateone grant, 2020 · $133k · revenue -14%
- CECivic Education Fundone grant, 2021 · $97k · revenue -95%
- 2P21 PROGRESS FUNDone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.
Comunidad seeks to build community, cultural pride, and economic opportunities for the Latino community on Vashon Island and its neighboring communities.
Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…
Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement
To provide services needed in the community
The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.
The Pacific Islander Community Association of WA PICA-WA serves as a cultural home, centers community power and advocates to further the wellness of Pacific Islander communities in Washington State.
Progreso's mission is to ensure that latino communities are fairly represented in washington states social, economic and political systems to improve the quality of life for all washingtonians. we believe that community-based support,…
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is Somali Family Safety Task Force Somali Family Safety Task Force. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Queer Power Alliance ↗
- Who funds SOMALI COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds GuideStar USA Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNER IN EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO ↗
- Who funds Latino Community Fund of Washington State ↗
- Who funds Civic Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Grassroots Power Project ↗
- Who funds 21 PROGRESS FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ENTRE HERMANOS ↗
- Who funds INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CULTURAL MEXICANO ↗
- Who funds EQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds LATINO CIVIC ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER COALITION ↗
- Who funds CASA LATINA ↗
- Who funds LATINOS EN SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds WAKULIMA USA ↗
- Who funds Scholar Fund ↗
- Who funds INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds TEENAGERS PLUS ↗
- Who funds SELF-SUPPORT FOR EARLY LEARNING & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Para Los Ninos de Highline ↗
- Who funds KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Fuse Innovation Fund ↗
- Who funds VILLA COMUNITARIA ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST KENYAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds West African Community Council ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC COUNTY IMMIGRANT SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds Consejo Counseling & Referral Service ↗
- Who funds MI CENTRO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · United Way of King County · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Colectiva Legal del Pueblo · Washington Progress Fund · School's Out Washington · Gates Foundation · Latino Community Fund of Washington State · Front and Centered · Puget Sound Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fair Work Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fair Work Center?
Find your warmest path to Fair Work Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.