Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH

INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $24,918,564 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($6,750,000). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
38
Grants received
$25M
Net assets
$8.8M
25/38 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Institute for Women's Policy Research does

Mission

Iwpr champions economic equity for all women and eliminates barriers to their full participation in society. As a leading national think tank, iwpr builds evidence to shape policies that grow women's power and influence, close inequality gaps, and improve the economic well-being of families.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

During the year, the organization ceased conducting the student parent success initiative program.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Research and action hub: this program provides research and disseminates information on issues including job quality (access to and quality of employment benefits such as paid maternity, parental, and family and medical leave), workplace flexibility (such as job sharing and flexible schedules), child care, and international comparison of work-family policies.

    $3,120,034 spentof which $199,787 as grants
    49% of program spending
  2. Center on economics of reproductive health: this program seeks to advance public understanding and awareness of the link between access to reproductive health care services for women and their long-term economic security and well-being. We conduct original research and policy analysis at the intersections of race, ethnicity, class, and reproductive health to improve economic outcomes, and educational and employment opportunities for all women.s related to race, ethnicity, gender and the economy.

    $1,434,765 spentof which $537,747 as grants$109,960 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  3. Institutional programmatic support: institutional support is multi-year funding provided to enable iwpr to apply the funds flexibly, where most needed, or where a particular focus may cut across a variety of research areas. The funds are typically applied to various researchareas when products are urgently needed, but are also used to support general needs of research or other programs at iwpr, such as support for interns and fellows or for database or library resources, website development, and new hardware or software.

    $1,227,278 spentof which $60,332 as grants
    19% of program spending
  4. Economic security, mobility and equity: iwpr's economic security, mobility, and equity initiative highlights the extent of pay inequalities in the u.s. Labor market, the role of occupational segregation and discriminatory employment practices in perpetuating unequal pay and racial and ethnic gender inequities, and the lack of a comprehensive care infrastructure in reducing women's advancement and economic security. It also provides research on the effects of good jobs and work family policies on the well-being of workers, families, businesses, and communities.

    $571,950 spentof which $60,098 as grants
    9% of program spending
  5. Race, gender, ethnicity, and the economy: this program conducts original research and policy analysis using intersectional and racial equity frameworks to better understand the experiences of women of color, their families and communities in the economy and society.throughout the year, we organize convenings, symposia, and roundtables with national leaders, scholars, and practitioners and other key stakeholders on issues related to race, ethnicity, gender and the economy.

    $12,204 spentof which $4,536 as grants
    0% of program spending
  6. Status of women in the states.

    $9,340 spent
    0% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,375,571.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.9M) Expenses 100 ($2.9M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2019 Revenue 250 ($4.9M) Expenses 132 ($3.9M) Net assets 236 ($4.1M)2020 Revenue 211 ($4.1M) Expenses 142 ($4.1M) Net assets 234 ($4.1M)2021 Revenue 218 ($4.2M) Expenses 143 ($4.2M) Net assets 238 ($4.2M)2022 Revenue 520 ($10M) Expenses 161 ($4.7M) Net assets 826 ($15M)2023 Revenue 409 ($8.0M) Expenses 229 ($6.7M) Net assets 876 ($15M)2024 Revenue 334 ($6.5M) Expenses 238 ($6.9M) Net assets 850 ($15M)2025 Revenue 90 ($1.7M) Expenses 270 ($7.9M) Net assets 502 ($8.8M)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (90)Expenses (270)Net assets (502)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $5.6M to $17M (+203%).

$1.9M
$4.5M
$6.6M
$5.6M
$17M
$18M
$17M
$11M
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 31% · 2019 4% · 2020 18% · 2021 5% · 2022 0% · 2023 0% · 2024 0% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$970k
’17
$1.0M
’19
−$42k
’20
$77k
’21
$5.4M
’22
$1.3M
’23
−$450k
’24
−$6.1M
’25
7.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jamila Taylor

CEO

Board chair

Paula Sammons

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2420252224211715
Joined··+7+2+3+3+3+4
No longer listed··251676
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $757k → $2.2M.

6 of 38 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 38 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

27%
largest funder
57%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 25% · 2019 35% · 2020 31% · 2021 31% · 2022 26% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 15 states in all.

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $71k on record.

State$71k
10
11
21
22
By state
  • CT$71k
  • VT$150

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 15%Fundraising 4%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

38%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 28 states

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH?
INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $24,918,564 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($6,750,000). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH have?
IRS filings report 38 organizations giving $24,918,564 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH, 25 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $6,750,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN'S POLICY RESEARCH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 38 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing