· Public charity
Institute for Women's Policy Research
Iwpr champions economic equity for all women and eliminates barriers to their full participation in society.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $738k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YELLOWHAMMER FUND | $125,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO | $87,500 |
| IPAS - AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION | $75,000 |
| DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS | $75,000 |
| BELLEVUE COLLEGE | $75,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $75,000 |
| OHLONE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | $50,000 |
| FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| HOWARD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $50,000 |
| TRUMAN COLLEGE | $40,000 |
| TAKE CONTROL INITIATIVE | $35,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR REPRODUCTIVE EDUCATION | $25,000 |
| SOLANO COMMUNITY COLLEGE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CLUB | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.
The purpose of the family planning council of iowa is to assure access to quality reproductive healthcare and family planning for all people.
Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation
We provide financial assistance and emotional support while building community spaces for people who need abortions in texas unapologetically, with compassion and conviction. through organizing and movement-building, we foster a positive…
The texas academy of family physicians is dedicated to the promotion of a health care environment that values the vital role of family physicians in providing quality, comprehensive care to all texans.
Our vision is a nation where the best health and health care are equally accessible and affordable to all.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.
The human rights campaign foundation is organized for the charitable and educational purposes of promoting public education and welfare for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq+) community. the hrc foundation envisions…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Provide funding and logistical support to ensure southerners receive safe and compassionate reproductive care including abortion services. through education and leadership development we build power in communities of color to abolish…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for Reproductive Education and the most unlike its peers is Yellowhammer Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Institute for Women's Policy Research funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.