· Public charity
March of Dimes Inc
See schedule omarch of dimes leads the fight for the health of all moms and babies.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $4,387,325 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,718,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,331,275 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $258k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+4 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $1,048,955 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $750,000 |
| CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $625,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $544,359 |
| ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO | $200,000 |
| VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $200,000 |
| BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL | $91,252 |
| OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY | $80,392 |
| THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA | $80,000 |
| BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION | $72,875 |
| CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $61,509 |
| PRISMA HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP - MIDLANDS | $60,000 |
| SSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - ST LOUIS | $55,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL | $51,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $342k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.3M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $1.3M to organizations and $4k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: RESEARCH & MEDICAL
Stated purpose: RESEARCH & MEDICAL
Stated purpose: RESEARCH & MEDICAL
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2018–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +47%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY3× · 2018–2023 · $4.3M · revenue +76%
University of Chicago3× · 2018–2022 · $2.4M · revenue +52%
Funded once
- RUREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAone grant, 2021 · $220k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSone grant, 2023 · $200k
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…
Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Birth Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 290 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds Dimensions Health Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Direct Relief · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Episcopal Health Foundation · St Baldrick's Foundation Inc · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization March of Dimes Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Connecticut Women's Consortium Inc — 82% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey — 43% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Roberta's House Inc — 21% of income from government
- Central Jersey Medical Center Inc — 20% of income from government
- Community Clinic Inc — 16% of income from government
- Northeast Florida Healthy Start Coalition Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Baystate Medical Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center — 0% of income from government
- Dimensions Health Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.