Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Godley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$4.4MHealth$1.3MEnvironment$906kEducation$718kPhilanthropy$463kFood & Nutrition$410kHousing & Shelter$310kCommunity Improvement$200kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS$250,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$200,000
AMERICARES$175,000
HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM$100,000
RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION$75,000
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC$50,000
EARTHENABLE$50,000
SEED GLOBAL HEALTH$50,000
THE BOMA PROJECT$50,000
SANERGY INC$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION (PROJECT ECHO)$50,000
GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS$50,000
ECHOING GREEN$50,000
INTEGRATE HEALTH$50,000
LAST MILE HEALTH$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTEGRATE HEALTH: $50k → 7%EARTHENABLE: $50k → 8%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $200k → 16%LIVING GOODS: $50k → 10%MY AGRO FARMS: $75k → 16%MY AGRO FARMS: $75k → 17%AMERICARES: $333k → 9%LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 14%ASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS: $250k → 7%HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM: $80k → 6%THE BOMA PROJECT: $50k → 11%EARTHENABLE: $50k → 8%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $171k → 16%LIVING GOODS: $50k → 10%MY AGRO FARMS: $75k → 16%MY AGRO FARMS: $50k → 17%AMERICARES: $333k → 9%LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 14%HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM: $80k → 6%THE BOMA PROJECT: $50k → 11%EARTHENABLE: $50k → 8%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $150k → 16%LIVING GOODS: $50k → 10%MY AGRO FARMS: $75k → 16%AMERICARES: $250k → 9%LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 14%HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM: $80k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN: $153k → 17%AMERICARES: $223k → 9%RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM: $55k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN: $150k → 17%AMERICARES: $215k → 9%RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%HEALTHCARE WITHOUT HARM: $100k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $150k → 16%ECHOING GREEN: $100k → 17%AMERICARES: $175k → 9%RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ECHOING GREEN: $75k → 17%AMERICARES: $175k → 9%RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%AMERICARES: $175k → 9%SEED GLOBAL HEALTH: $75k → 16%SEED GLOBAL HEALTH: $75k → 16%SEED GLOBAL HEALTH: $75k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
NM
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 31 repeat orgs$602k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$7.6M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+67%

Still filing today

87%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $430k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $971k · revenue +84%
  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $678k · revenue +107%
  • MF
    MYAGRO FARMS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $375k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • BH
    BUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +184%
  • SF
    SOLAR FREEZE (FISCAL SPONSOR ECHOING GREEN)
    one grant, 2018 · $27k
  • EA
    Energy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
5
Village Empowerment Inc

Village empowerment inc. (hereinafter referred to as 've') is a non-profit organization incorporated on 4th january, 2007. it is registered under section 501(c)(3) of the u.s. internal revenue code. ve is an organization dedicated to bring…

International
6
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
7
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
8
Project Orbis International Inc

Orbis builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach

International
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
11
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
12
Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Build Health International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Health Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%51%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
24/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,879,666 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCSANERGY INC — $400,000 · InternationalSANERGY INCEARTHENABLE INC — $310,000 · InternationalEARTHENABLE INCTHE BOMA PROJECT INC — $250,000 · InternationalTHE BOMA PROJECT INCLwala Community Alliance — $200,000 · InternationalLwala Community AllianceACUMEN FUND INC — $150,000 · InternationalLIVING GOODS — $150,000 · International+3 more — $120,500 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $970,984 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPR…LAST MILE HEALTH — $300,000 · HealthLAST MILE HEALTHASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS — $250,000 · HealthASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DI…Integrate Health Inc — $200,000 · HealthIntegrate Health IncGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $150,000 · HealthGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INCEYELLIANCE INC — $100,000 · Health+2 more — $55,000 · HealthECHOING GREEN INC — $677,658 · EducationECHOING GREEN IN…SEED GLOBAL HEALTH — $375,000 · EducationSEED GLOBAL HEAL…GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP — $85,000 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANI…CAREMESSAGE — $60,000 · EducationPROJECT DRAWDOWN — $50,000 · Education+3 more — $41,100 · EducationMYAGRO FARMS — $375,000 · OtherMYAGRO FARM…Individual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherIndividual …BUTTERNUT VALLEY ALLIANCE — $61,000 · OtherBUTTERNUT V…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION — $60,000 · OtherPLANNED PAR…UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION (PROJECT ECHO) — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO (UCSF HEAL INITIATIVE) — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY …+12 more — $179,048 · Other+12 moreHEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM — $395,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $120,000 · EnvironmentSAHA GLOBAL INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentEnergy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporation — $20,000 · EnvironmentLEGADO INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentOpenAQ Inc — $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $430,000 · PhilanthropyBUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyMSI US — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $9,400 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $50,000 · Civil Rights
International$3,460,166Health$2,025,984Education$1,288,758Other$885,048Environment$595,000Philanthropy$504,400Civil Rights$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,879,666 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $970,984 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC — $677,658 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $430,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSANERGY INC — $400,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetHEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM — $395,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetMYAGRO FARMS — $375,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSEED GLOBAL HEALTH — $375,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetEARTHENABLE INC — $310,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH — $300,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS — $250,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC — $250,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc — $200,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetLwala Community Alliance — $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC — $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $150,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetLIVING GOODS — $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS — $100,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEYELLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP — $85,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetBUTTERNUT VALLEY ALLIANCE — $61,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetCAREMESSAGE — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMSI US — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE CARE SOLAR — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEnergy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporation — $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetLEGADO INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPLANT DOCS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOpenAQ Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $15,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrapevine giving foundation — $9,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US — $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM ↗
  • Who funds MYAGRO FARMS ↗
  • Who funds SEED GLOBAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAST MILE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF MIGRAINE DISORDERS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Integrate Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
  • Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING GOODS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds EYELLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds BUTTERNUT VALLEY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CAREMESSAGE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MSI US ↗
  • Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
  • Who funds SAHA GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Energy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LEGADO INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Mulago FoundationDovetail Impact Found…Skoll FundImpactassetsincThe Ray and Tye Noord…The Skoll FoundationGates FoundationSegal Family Foundati…Rippleworks IncArie and Ida Crown Me…Boston Foundation Inc
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA31.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Mulago Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Skoll Fund · Impactassetsinc · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · Gates Foundation · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Rippleworks Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Boston Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Godley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Godley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Godley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home