Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Horrigan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$753kEducation$474kReligion$41kFood & Nutrition$27kArts & Culture$22kHealth$14kInternational$13kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$555k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$70,000
OUR LADY OF THE SNOWS$25,000
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL$4,500
GRACE CLINIC$3,450
BENTON FRANKLIN RECOVERY COALITION$1,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$500
TRI CITIES FOOD BANK$500
NORTHWEST'S CHILD$500
FRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$500
CHRIST THE KING SCHOOL$500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SERVING CENTRAL WASHINGTON$500
VIRGIE ROBINSON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
SENIOR CONNECTION$250
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$200
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SENIOR CONNECTION: $250 → 7%FULL LIFE CARE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$613k · 39 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
26

Total granted

$613k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+63%

Still filing today

49%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $431k · revenue +42%
  • SU
    SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +62%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • WM
    WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +82%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FL
    FULL LIFE CARE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
3
Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…

Health
4
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
5
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
6
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
7
Swedish Edmonds

Swedish edmonds is part of swedish health services, a healthcare system committed to meeting the health-care needs of snohomish county.

Health
8
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

9
Sexual Violence Law Center

Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…

Human Services
10
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
11
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
12
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Public Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Virgie Robinson Memorial Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNyc Independent SchoolsChristian Evangelical Minis…Supportive Housing Developm…Global Systems Change Advoc…Performing Arts Organizatio…Washington State Advocacy N…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr15%3%35–55yr17%85%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/41
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,121

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
30/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $750,601 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+2 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $430,835 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY+5 more — $5,000 · EducationEKARI — $35,700 · OtherEKARIOUR LADY OF THE SNOWS — $25,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF TH…CHRIST THE KING CHURCH — $11,600 · OtherCHRIST THE KIN…GIRL SCOUTS — $10,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTSHOLY NAMES ACADEMY — $9,550 · OtherHOLY NAMES ACA…ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $9,500 · OtherST PATRICK CAT…SEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $9,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,100 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $7,500 · Other+38 more — $50,017 · Other+38 moreSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $26,500 · Human ServicesFULL LIFE CARE — $2,000 · Human Services+3 more — $2,200 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC — $3,300 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $2,000 · InternationalRAINBOW OF MAGNOLIA FOUNTAINS OF LIFE — $1,500 · InternationalMercy Corps — $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $700 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $500 · InternationalGRACE CLINIC — $3,450 · HealthBENTON FRANKLIN RECOVERY COALITION — $2,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $1,000 · HealthWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $5,300 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $250 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$752,601Education$435,835Other$176,167Human Services$30,700International$9,000Health$7,950Arts & Culture$7,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $430,835 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $26,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $9,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $7,500 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $3,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENTON FRANKLIN RECOVERY COALITION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFULL LIFE CARE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGIE ROBINSON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $1,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetMercy Corps — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST'S CHILD — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budget3 Rivers Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITIES FOOD BANK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLYMOUTH HEALING COMMUNITIES — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Education — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIJAH FAMILY HOMES — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC
  • Who funds GRACE CLINIC
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HUMANS AND NATURE
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds BENTON FRANKLIN RECOVERY COALITION
  • Who funds FULL LIFE CARE
  • Who funds ROOTS OF SOUTH SUDAN
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC
  • Who funds RAINBOW OF MAGNOLIA FOUNTAINS OF LIFE
  • Who funds SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE
  • Who funds THE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds VIRGIE ROBINSON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA24.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · 3 Rivers Community Foundation · Raikes Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Columbus Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Horrigan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph