· Private foundation
Jonathan a Holloway Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k49 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SPOKANE SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OBE'S ANGELS RESCUE | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CHILD ART FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $2,600 |
| SHINE 1049 | $2,005 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| CORTEZ SENIOR CENTER | $1,500 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $1,200 |
| KCTS 9 | $1,200 |
| NPCA | $1,200 |
| WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION | $1,200 |
| WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSPOKANE SCHOLARS FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +108%
- MNMUSICFEST NORTHWEST5× · 2017–2023 · $74k · revenue +218% · 55% of their budget
- WTWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION6× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- HCHAL COKER MEMORIAL BENEFITone grant, 2023 · $6k
- MSMONTEZUMA SCHOOL TO FARM PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $5k
- MVMancos Valley Resourcesone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.
Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.
Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.
Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.
The council of western state foresters (cwsf) promotes the conservation, protection, and sustainable management of forests for today and generations to come by leading collective action, fostering learning, facilitating resource sharing,…
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
Advocate for tax policy in Washington State
To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mountaineers and the most unlike its peers is International Child Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 35% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPOKANE SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSICFEST NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ANNIES ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE EQUINE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Mancos Valley Resources ↗
- Who funds Spokane Symphony Associates ↗
- Who funds MONTEZUMA SCHOOL TO FARM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILD ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH IDAHO FAIR & RODEO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON POWER FUTURE ↗
- Who funds STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS FOUNDATION OF ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Lucky Seven Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation - Mark · Numerica Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jonathan a Holloway Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jonathan a Holloway Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jonathan a Holloway Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.