· Private foundation
Viking Foundation of Lincoln
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION | $7,500 |
| EXTREME COMMUNITY MAKEOVER | $6,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO | $6,000 |
| BELMONT COMMUNITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| IOWA GARDENING FOR GOOD | $5,000 |
| FOSTER SQUAD | $5,000 |
| DES MOINES REFUGEE SUPPORT | $5,000 |
| NEBRASKA APPLESEED | $5,000 |
| EVERYBODY WINS IOWA | $5,000 |
| NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ACLU OF NEBRASKA | $5,000 |
| LINCOLN LITERACY | $5,000 |
| LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAREER ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MARIA DROSTE COUNSELING CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +99%
- CCCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +9%
- MAMIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER6× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- DFDRESS FOR SUCCESS DES MOINESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +37%
- EIEmergencyRV Incone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +15%
- YOYOUTH ON RECORDone grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.
To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.
Voices for children in nebraska is the independent voice building pathways to opportunity for all children and families through research, policy and community engagement.
To resettle refugees in nebraska and provide them the support they need to thrive.
The mission of the urban league of nebraska is to be an empowering voice in the community advocating for economic self-reliance, parity, power, civil rights and equal opportunity for all (see schedule o). the vision of the urban league of…
The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.
Helping families thrive. we are family focused, adaptable, passionate, collaborative, accountable, and preventative.
To provide a reasonable volume of developmentally disabled services to residents of the surrounding region who are or shall be diagnosed or thought to be developmentally disabled.
Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals From the Heartland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Hand Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 46. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 12% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVERYBODY WINS - IOWA ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds MIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
- Who funds Des Moines Refugee Support ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN BIKE KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds EXTREME COMMUNITY MAKEOVER ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds KARIS COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds FRESH START INC ↗
- Who funds BookGive Inc ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Foster Squad ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS DES MOINES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds WEECYCLE ↗
- Who funds DESERVING DENTAL ORG ↗
- Who funds MEALS FROM THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds EmergencyRV Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON RECORD ↗
- Who funds COLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds WILLARD COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPESPOKE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Cooper Foundation · Abel Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · The Denver Foundation · D F Dillon Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Jc & Jessie Seacrest Family Fndtn First Nebraska Trust Co Trustee · The Colorado Health Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Viking Foundation of Lincoln funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.