Skip to content

Alaska · Nonprofit

Challenge Alaska

Challenge Alaska (Alaska) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,397,589 to it, the largest being RASMUSON FOUNDATION ($348,900). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.5M
Funders on record
29
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$2.6M
17/29 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%
01What it does

What Challenge Alaska does

Mission

Challenge Alaska improves the lives of people with disabilities, their families, and the community through adaptive sports, therapeutic recreation, and education.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Therapeutic Recreation - The organization operates a therapeutic recreation program designed to create an inclusive community through sports, recreation and education. Activities include direct services to individuals with physical, developmental, and intellectual disabilities, as well as providing training, education and support to agencies, businesses, hospitals and school districts in the greater Anchorage area and statewide. Programs also include dedicated programming for Veterans living with disability.

    $1,039,490 spentof which $49,949 as grants
    61% of program spending
  2. Adaptive Ski School - The organization operates an adaptive ski and snowboard school in the winter season from its facility located in Girdwood Alaska adjacent to the largest ski resort in the state, Alyeska Resort. Operations include a full-service rental shop carrying the most up to date adaptive ski equipment and provides adapted ski lessons to individuals with disabilities using the latest PSIA/AASI adaptive instruction techniques.

    $652,932 spent$334,346 earned by the program
    39% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,692,422.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($977k) Expenses 100 ($837k) Net assets 100 ($839k)2018 Revenue 158 ($1.5M) Expenses 89 ($743k) Net assets 195 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 100 ($980k) Expenses 110 ($920k) Net assets 202 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 99 ($970k) Expenses 88 ($738k) Net assets 230 ($1.9M)2021 Revenue 82 ($798k) Expenses 91 ($764k) Net assets 234 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 146 ($1.4M) Expenses 118 ($985k) Net assets 287 ($2.4M)2023 Revenue 133 ($1.3M) Expenses 126 ($1.1M) Net assets 315 ($2.6M)2024 Revenue 186 ($1.8M) Expenses 182 ($1.5M) Net assets 350 ($2.9M)2025 Revenue 154 ($1.5M) Expenses 215 ($1.8M) Net assets 315 ($2.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (154)Expenses (215)Net assets (315)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $977k to $1.8M (+80%).

$977k
$1.8M
$1.7M
$2.1M
$2.1M
$2.5M
$2.7M
$3.5M
$3.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 4% · 2018 29% · 2019 9% · 2020 14% · 2021 29% · 2022 22% · 2023 7% · 2024 2% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$140k
’17
$795k
’18
$59k
’19
$232k
’20
$34k
’21
$445k
’22
$242k
’23
$294k
’24
−$297k
’25
8.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Clayton Beethe

Board President

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed192313131316151617
Joined·+4+4+3+2+5+2+3+3
No longer listed·014322322
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 13 funders, grant income fell $342k → $253k.

7 of 29 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 33% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Challenge Alaska’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Challenge Alaska has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Challenge Alaska.

25%
largest funder
45%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 94% · 2018 46% · 2019 30% · 2020 27% · 2021 28% · 2022 38% · 2023 16% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

62% of Challenge Alaska's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of Challenge Alaska's grant income comes from Alaska funders.

AK
WA
IL
MA
NJ
CT
MD
DE
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alaska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $459k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding Challenge Alaska receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.4M on record.

Federal$2.4M
grants $2.4Mcontracts $0
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$1.5M
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$861k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Challenge Alaska

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alaska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 4%Fundraising 2%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Challenge Alaska: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Challenge Alaska?
Challenge Alaska (Alaska) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,397,589 to it, the largest being RASMUSON FOUNDATION ($348,900). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Challenge Alaska have?
IRS filings report 29 organizations giving $1,397,589 in grants to Challenge Alaska, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Challenge Alaska?
RASMUSON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $348,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Challenge Alaska find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Challenge Alaska →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 29 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing