· Private foundation
Saldanha Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH | $35,000 |
| VAIL VALLEY CATHOLIC CHURCH | $25,000 |
| BRAVO VAIL | $25,000 |
| CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA | $3,000 |
| ABUSED WOMENS AID IN CRISIS | $3,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| MY HOUSE | $2,000 |
| CAMPFIRE ALASKA | $1,500 |
| PRATHAM USA | $1,000 |
| ALYESKA SKI CLUB | $1,000 |
| ALASKA WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL | $850 |
| GIRDWOOD FOOD PANTRY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRROUNDUP RIVER RANCH5× · 2019–2024 · $180k · revenue +55%
- CACHERYSH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +234% · 50% of their budget
- DRDOODLE ROCK RESCUE3× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +7%
Funded once
THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -8%
ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMYone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -3%- CRCRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Protect alaska's wild lands and waters by inspiring broad support for federal policy action.
Enhance wild sheep populations, promote scientific wildlife management, educate the public on sheep and enhance sheep hunting and view opportunities in alaska.
To serve our community by promoting animal welfare and strengthening the animal-human bond. to improve the lives of pets through education and protection. to shelter stray, abandoned, and surrendered pets and find them loving homes.
Assd trains and deploys highly qualified and certified search dog teams to support and assist law enforcement and other government agencies in the search, rescue, and recovery of missing persons.
The mission of the Alaska Avalanche School is to provide exceptional experience-based avalanche safety education to all users of the mountain environment.
Dedicated to strengthening the multi-disciplinary response to child abuse. We strive to ensure that professionals throughout Alaska are equipped to do the best job possible at holding offenders accountable and helping children and families…
Founded in 1922, the association assists american indian and alaska native nations in their efforts to achieve full economic, social and civic equality, and to defend their rights. the association is governed by a board of directors…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abused Women's Aid in Crisis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western New York Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHERYSH AMERICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWOOD WOMANS CLUB ↗
- Who funds ABUSED WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds DOODLE ROCK RESCUE ↗
- Who funds MAT-SU YOUTH HOUSING ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds ALASKA WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ALYESKA SKI CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds ALASKA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds Challenge Alaska ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Ski Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Western New York Impact Foundation ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · Swanson Family Foundation · The Carr Foundation Inc · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Saldanha Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.