Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leotta Gordon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$253kHuman Services$42kYouth Development$37kEnvironment$27kCrime & Legal$21kRecreation & Sports$21kPublic Benefit$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$307k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAIROSPDX$20,000
MANY NATIONS ACADEMY$7,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
CASCADIA WILDLANDS$4,000
CASA$4,000
PORTLAND YOUTH BUILDERS$3,000
CHILDREN'S CENTER$3,000
CIVICS LEARNING PROJECT$3,000
FRIENDLY HOUSE$3,000
SMUS SOCIETY$2,000
NW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES$2,000
CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES$2,000
YMCA OF MARION COUNTY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $3k → 15%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $2k → 8%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $2k → 8%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $3k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $2k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $2k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $2k → 12%FRIENDLY HOUSE: $1k → 12%YOUTH VILLAGES: $2k → 12%YOUTH VILLAGES: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$403k · 25 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$403k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+23%

Still filing today

56%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KAIROSPDX
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +313%
  • CW
    CASCADIA WILDLANDS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +299%
  • Portland YouthBuilders
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • CASA FOR CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +27%
  • LO
    LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CO
    CEASEFIRE OREGON EDUCATION FOUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
Trillium Family Services

Building brighter futures with children and families.

Housing & Shelter
4
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
5
Olalla Center

To help strengthen and heal children and families, and the community. olalla center's staff believes all children and families can heal and this premise is the foundation of olalla center's treatment philosophy and the basis for their work.

6
Family and Community Together

Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…

Human Services
7
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
8
Mitch Charter School

We believe that the strength of our community lies in its diversity. we know the power of many different voices at the table. these voices resound from the hearts and minds of our youth, who hold the keys to a just, fair and sustainable…

Education
9
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
10
Parenting With Intent

Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.

Human Services
11
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
12
Portland Trails

Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr19%46%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr15%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%51%10–20yr19%31%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr15%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
927/7,476

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
22/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MANY NATIONS ACADEMY — $59,500 · OtherMANY NATIONS ACADEMYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SMUS — $12,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SMUSSATURDAY ACADEMY — $9,500 · OtherSATURDAY ACADEMYNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES — $9,500 · OtherNW ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETESCASA — $8,500 · OtherCASAIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL — $8,000 · OtherREADING RESULTS — $7,000 · OtherYMCA OF MARION COUNTY — $6,000 · OtherOREGON HUMANITIES — $6,000 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS COURSE INC — $7,000 · Other+11 more — $18,200 · Other+11 moreKAIROSPDX — $132,500 · EducationKAIROSPDX+3 more — $3,000 · EducationFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $18,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY …YOUTH VILLAGES INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH VIL…CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $6,500 · Human ServicesCLACKAMAS…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesPortland YouthBuilders — $20,500 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASCADIA WILDLANDS — $26,500 · EnvironmentChildrens Center — $19,100 · Crime & LegalCivics Learning Project — $4,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $2,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$159,200Education$135,500Human Services$33,500Youth Development$28,000Environment$26,500Crime & Legal$23,100Arts & Culture$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKAIROSPDX — $132,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCASCADIA WILDLANDS — $26,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPortland YouthBuilders — $20,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetChildrens Center — $19,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDLY HOUSE INC — $18,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREADING RESULTS — $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS COURSE INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCivics Learning Project — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGirls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildcat Ridge Sanctuary — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADIA HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMART READING — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAIROSPDX
  • Who funds CASCADIA WILDLANDS
  • Who funds Portland YouthBuilders
  • Who funds Childrens Center
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC
  • Who funds READING RESULTS
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS COURSE INC
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds Civics Learning Project
  • Who funds Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest
  • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING
  • Who funds Wildcat Ridge Sanctuary
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds SERENDIPITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CASCADIA HEALTH
  • Who funds SMART READING
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR32.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Hoover Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leotta Gordon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Clackamas Women's Services37% of income from government
  • Kairospdx22% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center21% of income from government
  • Portland YouthBuilders10% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest6% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum6% of income from government
  • Civics Learning Project5% of income from government
  • Smart Reading4% of income from government
  • Cascadia Health2% of income from government
  • Serendipity Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Casa for Children Inc2% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
  • Reading Results1% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leotta Gordon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Leotta Gordon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph