Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC (New York) is funded by 13 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $282,762 in grants to it, the largest being SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND ($70,250). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC's revenue fell 58% between 2023 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,483 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
$13k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $95k and 6 in 2023.
8 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 66% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2023 53% · 2024 37% · 2025 60% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC draws 58% of its grant income from funders outside New York — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 9 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
81% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 27 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2023–2024), and the filings of 13funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing