Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Shared Ascent Fund

SHARED ASCENT FUND's mission is to promote the common good by upholding democratic values, promoting health, and advancing social equity.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Public Benefit$5.8MCrime & Legal$2.0MCivil Rights$1.5MArts & Culture$400kScience & Tech$400kEducation$150kEnvironment$29kSocial Science$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $500k
  • $250k+3 grants · $750k
$250,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC$250,000
VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT$250,000
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC$250,000
ALL VOTING IS LOCAL$200,000
CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER$200,000
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $400k → 8%RESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $29k → 12%LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $150k → 17%AMERICAN BRIDGE 21ST CENTURY FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS: $25k → 17%THE CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIC LIFE: $100k → 14%ADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC: $100k → 6%WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $150k → 17%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $400k → 14%INDIVISIBLE CIVICS INC: $350k → 14%DEMAND JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1.5M → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $630k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $500k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $250k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $250k → 14%CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $174k → 14%LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW: $150k → 14%VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $125k → 14%PUSHBLACK: $50k → 14%ISSUE ONE: $75k → 14%VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $250k → 14%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $75k → 14%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $250k → 14%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $250k → 14%CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $100k → 14%LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $530k → 14%LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $400k → 14%CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER: $200k → 14%ALL VOTING IS LOCAL: $200k → 14%PRIORITIES USA FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $150k → 14%LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $100k → 14%CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER: $100k → 14%LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $100k → 14%CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER: $100k → 14%CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER: $100k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE: $100k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE: $25k → 14%AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $24k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 6 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$4.7M
$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+68%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitCrime & LegalEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $675k · revenue +47%
  • VR
    VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +35%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AF
    AB FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue +651%
  • DJ
    DEMAND JUSTICE INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +96% · 39% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue ×12

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
3
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
4
American Constitution Society for Law & Policy

The american constitution society for law and policy (acs) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan legal organization. through a diverse nationwide network of progressive lawyers, law students, judges, scholars, advocates, and many others,…

Education
5
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
6
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
7
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
8
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
9
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
10
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
11
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
12
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pushblack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%30%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr22%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr13%23%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr18%31%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr22%13%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
5,011/42,312

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $1,803,750 · Crime & LegalTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INCDEMAND JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,455,000 · Crime & LegalDEMAND JUSTICE INITIATIVECONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER — $500,000 · Crime & LegalCONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTERAB FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 · Public BenefitAB FOUNDATIONTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,130,000 · Public BenefitTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FU…CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $675,000 · Public BenefitCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS…+2 more — $175,000 · Public BenefitVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $475,000 · OtherVOTER REGISTR…THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $400,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN …Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $150,000 · OtherLawyers' Comm…LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 · OtherLEAGUE OF WOM…+1 more — $25,000 · OtherINDIVISIBLE CIVICS — $350,000 · Civil RightsINDIVISIBLE…ALL VOTING IS LOCAL — $200,000 · Civil RightsALL VOTING …PRIORITIES USA FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Civil RightsPRIORITIES …PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $150,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEM…ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $125,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERI…PUSHBLACK — $50,000 · Civil RightsTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $400,000 · InternationalADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC — $100,000 · InternationalWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $150,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationRESOURCES LEGACY FUND — $28,841 · EnvironmentAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $23,750 · Philanthropy
Crime & Legal$3,758,750Public Benefit$3,480,000Other$1,200,000Civil Rights$1,075,000International$500,000Education$165,000Environment$28,841Philanthropy$23,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $1,803,750 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetAB FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDEMAND JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $1,455,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,130,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $675,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER — $500,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $475,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $400,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS — $350,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetALL VOTING IS LOCAL — $200,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPRIORITIES USA FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIC LIFE — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetISSUE ONE — $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPUSHBLACK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND — $28,841 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $23,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundTides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincResources Legacy FundWellspring Philanthro…Foundation to Promote…Hopewell FundJewish Community Fede…Amalgamated Charitabl…The San Francisco Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
New Venture FundDC18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Resources Legacy Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Hopewell Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shared Ascent Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home