· Private foundation
Foundation for Truth Justice and Compassion
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+4 grants · $6.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH | $4,515,983 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC | $1,000,000 |
| RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $750,000 |
| LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH | $650,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC | $100,000 |
| PROACTIVE FQHC INC | $50,000 |
| DIAMOND BLACKFAN ANEMIA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RUNX1 FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LPLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH5× · 2021–2025 · $13M · revenue -35%
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC4× · 2021–2025 · $3.1M · revenue -12%
- RERAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue -8%
Funded once
- VRVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +43%
- TATHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue ×12
- CSCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUNDone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
The organization is founded for social welfare purposes, including assisting with voter registration and advocating for policies which lead to increased voter registration in the united states.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The arc prize foundation advances progress toward artificial general intelligence (agi) by creating public benchmarks, running competitions,and fostering a global research community. we educate students, researchers, and the broader public…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The ab foundation's mission is to compare and contrast progressive and conservative solutions to america's public policy concerns and to educate the american people and the nation's leaders on the results of that research.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The world privacy forum is dedicated to reimaging privacy in a digital era through ground-breaking, in-depth privacy research and consumer education of the highest quality. our vision is to empower people with the knowledge, rights, and…
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project and the most unlike its peers is Proactive Fqhc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
- Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds All Americans Vote ↗
- Who funds PORTOLA VALLEY THEATRE CONSERVATORY INC ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADA NEWS BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds THE HORSE PARK AT WOODSIDE ↗
- Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Proactive Fqhc Inc ↗
- Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds RUNX1 Foundation dba RUNX1 Research Program ↗
- Who funds BEYOND LIBERTY ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND BLACKFAN ANEMIA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation for Truth Justice and Compassion funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.