· Private foundation
The Peninsula Charities Foundation II
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $230k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
- $250k+7 grants · $5.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMPACT ACCESS FOUNDATION | $2,000,000 |
| CHESHIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDER OF AM | $850,000 |
| NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL | $700,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $325,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $300,000 |
| MONADNOCK CONSERVANCY | $275,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND | $100,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $50,000 |
| BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC | $50,000 |
| BAX BROOKLYN ARTS EXCHANGE | $45,000 |
| FOOD BANK NYC | $45,000 |
| HOOK ARTS MEDIA | $40,000 |
| APPPAH | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $379k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
60 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $910k · revenue +29%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $68k · revenue +1%
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC3× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- KEKROKA EXPEDITIONS INCone grant, 2024 · $800k · revenue 0% · 25% of their budget
- TTTHE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUSTone grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
- TWTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Street Cry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 26% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Cheshire Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds KROKA EXPEDITIONS INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TRURO CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Monadnock Conservancy ↗
- Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BLUECHECK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds HOOK ARTS MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds KEYS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Florida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds STREET CRY INC ↗
- Who funds TRURO COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Ocean Reef Community Foundation Inc · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Miami Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Peninsula Charities Foundation II funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Star of the Sea Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Upper Keys Humane Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Dolphin Research Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.