Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allison K Short Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$89kArts & Culture$52kReligion$42kHuman Services$40kHealth$13kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$12kEmployment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBION COLLEGE$16,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
THE JEFFERSON PROJECT$5,000
STUDIO 23$5,000
BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
CAN COUNCIL$3,000
DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEADWATERS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 11%ALBION COLLEGE: $16k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%CAN COUNCIL: $3k → 18%HEADWATERS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 11%ALBION COLLEGE: $16k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%CAN COUNCIL: $3k → 18%HEADWATERS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 11%ALBION COLLEGE: $16k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10k → 14%CAN COUNCIL: $3k → 18%HEADWATERS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 11%ALBION COLLEGE: $16k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6k → 14%CAN COUNCIL: $3k → 18%HEADWATERS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 11%ALBION COLLEGE: $15k → 14%STUDIO 23: $5k → 14%CAN COUNCIL: $3k → 18%ALBION COLLEGE: $10k → 14%STUDIO 23: $5k → 14%STUDIO 23: $5k → 14%STUDIO 22: $5k → 14%STATE THEATRE: $4k → 14%STUDIO 23: $4k → 14%STATE THEATRE: $4k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4k → 14%STATE THEATRE: $3k → 14%BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%THE JEFFERSON PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE JEFFERSON PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE JEFFERSON PROJECT: $5k → 14%BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $4k → 14%BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $4k → 14%BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$172k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$172k
$2k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S2
    STUDIO 23
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +20%
  • CA
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +39%
  • BA
    BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Bay Artist Collective

The south bay artist collective's mission as a 501(c)3 non-profit is to support and grow the local visual arts community through creating a destination for art and creativity, while teaching and inspiring youth. our purpose is to support…

Arts & Culture
2
Bay Area Rehabilitation Center

Outpatient rehabilitation

3
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

4
Bayview-Hunters Point Center for Arts and Technology Dba Baycat

BAYCAT addresses racial, gender and economic inequity by creating powerful, authentic media while diversifying the creative industry. Through the education and employment of low-income youth, young people of color, and young women in the…

Community Improvement
5
Bay Area Chamber of Commerce

To faciliatate and collaborate on programs that support a thriving community and economic growth in bay county and the great lakes bay region.

6
Bay County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build and revitalize homes, communities, and hope.

7
Bay Human Services

To provide specialized residential services to mentally ill and disabled individuals in order to assist each person to meet personal goals by providing the highest quality services that are unique to each person's wishes, needs, and…

Human Services
8
Bay Area Council

Our program service accomplishments include successes within the policy and research framework for bay area infrastructure including transportation, housing and land use, homelessness, workforce of the future, gender equity and diversity,…

9
Bay Future Inc

Dedicated to facilitating economic development strategies that promote and secure opportunities for business retention, growth, and the attraction of new industries that create quality jobs for community residents.

Community Improvement
10
Bay View Community Center of Milwaukee Inc

We bring people together to build community as an inclusive, independent, community-supported nonprofit organization.

Human Services
11
Bainbridge Island Museum of Art

Bainbridge island museum of art (bima) inspires curiosity, wonder and understanding by connecting people with the contemporary art and craft of the puget sound region.

Arts & Culture
12
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $42,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $15,500 · OtherCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REG…BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER — $13,500 · OtherBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTERDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER — $13,000 · OtherDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTATE THEATRE — $11,000 · OtherSTATE THEATRESALVATION ARMY — $11,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY+2 more — $2,060 · OtherALBION COLLEGE — $89,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGESTUDIO 23 — $26,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO 23THE JEFFERSON PROJECT — $15,000 · Public BenefitRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Philanthropy
Other$120,560Education$89,000Arts & Culture$26,000Public Benefit$15,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALBION COLLEGE — $89,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDIO 23 — $26,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $15,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEFFERSON PROJECT — $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER — $13,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER — $13,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE
  • Who funds STUDIO 23
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION
  • Who funds THE JEFFERSON PROJECT
  • Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN'S CENTER
  • Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kantzler FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kantzler Foundation · Russell H & Maxine E Smith Charitable Foundation · Gougeon Employees Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allison K Short Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allison K Short Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Allison K Short Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph